Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Chocolat fourré au lait Ingrédients garniture au lait 47%( chocolat blanc(lait entier en poudre, beurrè de cacao, lactosérum en poudre(lait), lait écrémé en poudre, glucose, emulsifiant(lecithine), arôme naturel de vanille), graisses végétales(palme, palmiste, tournesol, huile de colza), sucre, glucose), sucre, beurre de cacao, lait entier en poudre, crème en poudre lait), pâte de cacao, émulsifiant lécithine), vanilline.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
15/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
51/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (22 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.