Search catalog

Vemondo Rajčatová pomazánka · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Vemondo Rajčatová pomazánka

Name: Vemondo Rajčatová pomazánka
Brand: Vemondo
SKU: 4056489887690

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4

Lisaained:5 tk

Andmete katvus:85%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score44/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

20% složka na bázi kokosového oleje (pitná voda, modifikovaný škrob, 4%** kokosový olej, jedlá sůl, mrkvový koncentrát, řepkový olej), 20% rajčata, pitná voda, řepkový olej, 7,5% rajčatová šťáva, cukr, cibule, škrob, 1% koncentrovaný rajčatový protlak, jedlá sůl, 1% sušená rajčata, ocet kvasný lihový, bylinky, modifikovaný škrob, kyselina: kyselina octová; koření, hořčičná semena, zahušťovadla: guma guar, xanthan, karubin; koncentrát citronové šťávy, koncentrát šťávy z červené řepy, dextróza.

Tuvastatud lisaained (4)

E260 E410 E412 E415

Product & Packaging

CategorySpreads

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity150 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

44/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 44/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts

64315010

Spreads. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Plant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Open Food Facts

6430016342865

Spreads. Ingredients: water, cashew (39%), citric acid, lactic acid, sorbic acid. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA1Lower processing burden

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Vemondo

Veganská pomazánka s paprikou

Spreads. Ingredients: Koncentrát, řepkový olej), 20% paprika, pitná voda, cibule, cukr, 3% třešňová paprika, pórek, škrob, jedlá sůl, ocet kvasný lihový, modifikovaný škrob, regulátor kyselosti: octany sodné; koření, koncentrovaný rajčatový protlak, paprikové pyré, zahušťovadla: guma guar, xanthan, karubin; hořčičná semena, kyselina: kyselina citronová; dextróza.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Flora

Flora Kevyt

Spreads. Ingredients: Vesi, kasviöljyt (rypsi, auringonkukka, pellavansiemen), kookosöljy, muunnettu tärkkelys, suola (1,0%), kaliumkloridi, emulgointiaineet (rasvahappojen mono - ja diglyseridit [kasvirasvapohjainen], lesitiini), säilöntäaine (kaliumsorbaatti), happamuudensäätöaine (sitruunahappo), luontainen aromi, vitamiinit (A, B1, D). Maidoton, laktoositon ja vegaaninen.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score44/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (4)

E260 E410 E412 E415

Product & Packaging

CategorySpreads

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity150 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

44/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 44/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (44 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Vemondo Rajčatová pomazánka

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 44/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

64315010

6430016342865

Veganská pomazánka s paprikou

Flora Kevyt

Vemondo Rajčatová pomazánka

Similar options worth comparing

64315010

6430016342865

Veganská pomazánka s paprikou

Flora Kevyt

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 44/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs