Search catalog

Corny Nuts & choc · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Corny Nuts & choc

Name: Corny Nuts & choc
Brand: Corny
SKU: 4011800407339

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4

Lisaained:3 tk

Andmete katvus:82%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (18 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

High saturated fat (7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

480 kcal

Protein / 100g

16 g

Sugar / 100g

4 g

Nutrition score60/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Paahdettu manteli 25%, paahdettu maapähkinä 22%, oligofruktoosisiirappi, tummasukdaa sis makeutusainetta 15% (makeutusaine (maltitoli), kaakaomassa, kaakaovoi, emulgointiaine (soijalesitiini), luontainen vanilja-aromi), makeutusaine (maltitolisiirappi). caysyvikaurahiutale, paahdettu soijapapu (soijapapu, merisuola), suklaa sis. makeutusainetta 4% (makeutusaine (maltitoli), kaakaomassa, vähärasvainen kaakaojauhe, luontainen vanilja-aromi, emulgointiaine (soijalesitiini), kosteudensäilyttäjä (glyseroli), auringonkukkaöljy, vahärasvainen kaakaojauhe, merisuola, emulgointiaine (soijalestiini). Saattaa sisältää pienia jäämiä muita pähkinöitä ja maitoa.

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E422 E965

Product & Packaging

CategoryPlant-based

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Nutrition score

60/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 60/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

60/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (18 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
High saturated fat (7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Elovena

Jugu sitruuna

Plant-based. Ingredients: Kaurapohja (vesi, gluteeniton kaura 8%), sokeri, sitruuna 4,2% (tiivisteestä), tärkkelys (peruna, maissi), rapsiöljy, sakeuttamisaineet (pektiini, gellaanikumi), sitruskuitu, perunaproteiini, kalsium, happamuudensäätöaine (natriumsitraatti), väri (beetakaroteeni, paprikaväri), suola, aromit, vitamiinit (B2, B12, D2), hapate. Gluteeniton, maidoton, vegaaninen.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

First Price

Pickled onions

Plant-based. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCPlant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Saarioinen

6412000016389

Plant-based. Ingredients: Sokeri, mansikka, vesi, sakeuttamisaine (E440), happa muudensäätöaine (E 330), säilöntäaine (E 202). 100 g tuotetta sisältää 35 g marjaa.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Salvest

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Plant-based. Ingredients: Hapukapsas (48%), kartul, porgand, odrakruup, sibul, rapsiöli, sool, suhkur, maitsetaimed, vürtsid.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA3Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Supporting factors

Fiber (18 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.

Need attention

High saturated fat (7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Energy / 100g

480 kcal

Protein / 100g

16 g

Sugar / 100g

4 g

Nutrition score60/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (2)

E422 E965

Product & Packaging

CategoryPlant-based

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Nutrition score

60/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 60/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

60/100

Nutrition score based on nutrient profile only.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

72/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Fiber (18 g/100 g) supports the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
High saturated fat (7 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 67%.
Impact: medium

Some source data is incomplete for this product: quantity. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Corny Nuts & choc

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 60/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Jugu sitruuna

Pickled onions

6412000016389

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Corny Nuts & choc

Similar options worth comparing

Jugu sitruuna

Pickled onions

6412000016389

Sauerkraut soup vegan

Nutrient profile

Supporting factors

Need attention

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 60/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Kõrge küllastunud rasva sisaldus

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs