Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
33
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
obio;Choc01at deiodéértdji tab «CHOt0t TABLETTE DE CHOCOLAT NOIR 70% DECACAOÀ DE GUÉRANDE IGREDIENTS: Chocolat noir à 70% de cacao minimum*: beurre d sucre de canne roux* 25,5%); fleur de sel de Guérande 1%. des ingrédients d'origine agricole sont issus de l'agriculture biologique. lit contenir des traces d'amande, de lait, de noisette, de sésame et d'arachides. DARK CHOCOLATE 70% COCOA MIN. WITH SEA SALT GREDIENTS: Dark chocolate 70% cocoa min.*: 99% (cocoa paste* and cocoa butter ne sugar* 25,5%); sea salt: 1%. 00% of agricultural inqredients result from organic farmin . contain traces of milkb almonds, hazelnuts, sesame see sand peanuts. ZARTBITTERSCHOKOLADE, 70% KAKAO MIT FLEUR DE SEL GUÉRANDE ITATEN: Zartbitterschokolade*: 99% (Kakaomasse* und Kakaobutter* 74.5%, Roh 5%), Fleur de sel: 1%. der Zutaten stammen aus ôkoloqischer Landwirtschaft. nn Spuren von Milch, Mandeln, Hase(nüssen, Sesam und Erdnüssen enthalten. - FONDANT CHOCOLADE TABLET VAN MINIMUM 70% CACAO MET BLOEMZOUT )REDIËNTEN: Zwarte chocolade 70% cacao minimum*: 99% (cacaomassa* en cac 5%, rietsuiker* 25,5%); bloemzout: 1%. ingrediënten afkomstig van de biologische landbouw. n sporen van melk, amandel, hazelnoot, sesam en pindals bevatten.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
33
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 77/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
33/100
33
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
81
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (39 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Snacks. Ingredients: Sötningsmedel/sødestoffer (maltitoler, sorbitoler, steviolglykosider), stabiliseringsmedel/stabilisator (gummi arabicum), ammoniumklorid (=salmiak), lakritsextrakt, aromer, vegetabiliska oljor (kokos, raps), fläderbärs-/hyldebær/hyllebær ekstrakt, ytbehandlings-/overladebehandlingsmiddel (karnaubavax/voks). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
67
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
97/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
69/100
medium reliability
Snacks. Ingredients: Raisins secs bio 40%, huile végétale de tournesol bio 20%, _Noix de cajou_ bio 20%, Physalis bio 10%, Cannerberge bio, (sucre de canne bio, huile végétale de tournesol bio), 10%, _Amandes_ bio.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage