Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
80
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Low signal
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
chou kale*, amande crue* vinaigre de cidre non-pasteurisé*, tamari*, paprika doux* , levure non maltée* , sel de Guérande * Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique Valeur nutritive pour 100 g > calories
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
80
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 71/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
80/100
80
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
83/100
83
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
52/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
18
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
65/100
medium reliability
Snacks. Ingredients: Chou (45,45%), amandes crues•. vinaigre de cidre non pasteurisé'. moutarde douce • (4,04%), tamari•, paprika fort', sel de Guérande. • Produit de. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
58
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
75/100
high reliability
Snacks. Ingredients: chou kale? (45,45%), amandes crues?, vinaigre de cidre non pasteurisé?, jus de citron* , tamari*, sel de Guérande ? Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
51
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
75/100
high reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage