The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Larsen Dovgan
Pantry. Ingredients: Kann kleine Muschelschalenreste und Spuren von KREBSTIEREN enthalten. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Coop
Pantry. Ingredients: water, dried peas 29% (Finland), 3,5% pork (Finland), lard, salt. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sprouts
Pantry. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Jalostaja
Pantry. Ingredients: Water, beef (origin: several EU countries), rennet, rapeseed oil, modified corn starch, _soy protein preparation_, pork (origin: Finland), beef heart, breadcrumbs (_wheat_), _milk powder_, _wheat flour_, sauce powder (i.a. spices (i.a. garlic, black pepper, paprika), aroma, flavor enhancer (E621)), potato flour, onion, spices (onion, white pepper, coriander, lovage), salt, _soy sauce_, potato fiber, color (E150c), stabilizer (E451), glucose, raising agent (E500), thickener (guar gum), sugar, corn maltodextrin, _soy sauce powder_, palm fat powder (includes _milk_), aroma. Meat content 10%.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
76/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
Weak
32/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
74/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
