The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Larsen Dovgan
Pantry. Ingredients: Kann kleine Muschelschalenreste und Spuren von KREBSTIEREN enthalten. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Coop
Pantry. Ingredients: water, dried peas 29% (Finland), 3,5% pork (Finland), lard, salt. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sprouts
Pantry. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Jalostaja
Pantry. Ingredients: Water, beef (origin: several EU countries), rennet, rapeseed oil, modified corn starch, _soy protein preparation_, pork (origin: Finland), beef heart, breadcrumbs (_wheat_), _milk powder_, _wheat flour_, sauce powder (i.a. spices (i.a. garlic, black pepper, paprika), aroma, flavor enhancer (E621)), potato flour, onion, spices (onion, white pepper, coriander, lovage), salt, _soy sauce_, potato fiber, color (E150c), stabilizer (E451), glucose, raising agent (E500), thickener (guar gum), sugar, corn maltodextrin, _soy sauce powder_, palm fat powder (includes _milk_), aroma. Meat content 10%.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Eau, _thon_ blanc germon (18 %), carottes (17 %), poivrons rouges rissolés (9 %), huile d'olive vierge extra, olives vertes (4,5 %), tomates mi-séchées (4 %), quinoa blanc et rouge (6,8 %), pois chiche (3 %), jus de citron, citron confit au sel (_sulfites_) (2 %), fécule de pomme de terre, plantes aromatiques, épices, sel.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
69/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
46/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (41 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
