
Open Food Facts
4740093942509
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage



The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products

Open Food Facts
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Mio & rio
Snacks. Ingredients: Nenugriebtas PIENAS (ne mažiau kaip bku [LT] Sokoladinis plombyras su šokolado gabaliukais vafliniame bia 49 %), cukrus, SVIESTAS, vanduo, vaflinis puodelis (7,7 %) (KVIETINIAI miltai, Dkukurūzų krakmolas, augaliniai riebalai (rapsy), SOJŲ baltymų koncentratas, emulsiklis SOJŲ lecitinai, tešlos kildymo medžiaga natrio karbonatai, druska, cukrus), šokolado gabaliukai (3 %) (cukrus, kakavos mase, kakavos Sviestas", emulsiklis SOJŲ lecitinai), gliukozės sirupas, kakavos milteliai (2.2 %), nugriebto PIENO milteliai, ISRUGU milteliai (iš PIENO), emulsiklis riebalų rūgščių mono - ir digliceridai, stabilizatoriai (saldžiųjų ceratonijų derva, pupenių derva, karageninas), kvapioji medžiaga. Kakavos sausuju medžiagų šokolade ne mažiau kaip 40 %. Gali būti RIEŠUTŲ ir ZEMES RIEŠUTU pedsaky.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Minimelts
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Gelatelli
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
vanilla ice cream coated kie milk chocolate (no 1) or black chocolate with pieces of amaretti biscuits (n03), or chocol ingredients tonnet no 1: vanilla ice cream* 67.8%, milk chocolate coating ** 32.2%, any gluten, egg, peanut and nuts, tonnet n02: vanilla ice cream* 63.7%, milk chocolate coating ** 30.3%, pieces of amal ilea 6%: (nuts), these possible gluten, egg, peanut and other nuts, onnet n03: vanilla ice cream* 63.7%, dark chocolate coating 30.3%: sugar, cocoa paste, butter ao, anhydrous milk fat, emulsifier: polyglycerol polyricinoleate, pieces of b aretti 6%: sugar, sweet apricot kernels, bitter apricot kernels, egg albumin, mandes (nuts), any gluten, soy, peanut and other nuts, nnet n04: vanilla ice cream* 657%, white chocolate coating 31 22%: sugar, whey dre butter (contains milk), anhydrous milk fat, milk powder' theyifiers: soy lecithin, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, flavouring, puffed rice beads 3 1 % iz, sugar, salt, cocoa butter, any gluten, egg, peanut and nut dl, vanilla ace: rehydrated skimmed milk (eu origin), water, sugar, vegetable fat (copra), )se-fructose, glucose syrup, lactose (contains milk) and milk proteins, emulsifier: fatty acid hots, gelling agents: carob seed flour, guar gum, flavour n e 0,06%, crushed vanilla pods exhausted , colours: annatto, curcumin, milk chocolate coating: sugar, cocoa butter, whey powder (contiefit milk), e of anhydrous milk, cocoa paste, skimmed milk powder, emulsifiers: lecithin, polyglycerol inoleate, ?ntages expressed on each pack,
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
33/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as kurkumiin, letsitiin, guarkummi support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).