Name: Dodu Nuggets
Brand: Dodu
SKU: 3596690147707

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality74/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

I noulet : Préparation à base de filetsdepoulet traités en salaison 5096 : filets de poulet (SOIL4 i 'o but ta cuit au goût fumé 15% : viatlde de cuisse de dinde 70% (soit 10,5% sur la recette), eau, dextroso i ; : fromages (WW, (bit), protéines de amidons modifiés, lactosérum sel - de rigour asement sélectionnée ou Biési}, Produit enfranceàpartirde PRODUIT CONDITIONNÉ C , merceauxd!o;. idfabriationdece produitslgstpossir)te : base de filets de poulet -;ecordôiibleudes: à base de pouiet traités en salaison : filets de viendede cuisse de dinde (soit 105% eau, beurre Ut), protéines de bis amidons 25±: farine de eau, sel, levure, épices, conservateur: E202. Huile de toumeso{ dœufs. partir de viande rigoureusement sélectionnée d'origine : UE ou Brésil. PROTECTRICE. rscalope cordon bleu de poulet à base de filets de poulet tiaitéS Préparation à base de filets de poulet traités en salaison 50% : filets dépou}et dinde goût fumé 15% : viande de cuisse de dinde 70% (soit Fromage fondu : fromages eau, beurre (lait), protéines de lait amidons (hit)tsei de Enrobage 25%: farine de blé eau, sel, levure, épices, conservateur: E202. Huile de tournesol, Traces éventuelles d'œuf. Produit en France à partir de viande rigoureusement sélectionnée d'origine : UE ou Brésil, CONDITIONNÉ SOUS ATMOSPHÈRE PROTECTRICE. t.iondece rodui il est ossibte u'il contienne encoredes etits morceauxdtos. aooo

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 60/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (54 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, quantity, category, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality74/100

Data confidence

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 60/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (54 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Dodu Nuggets

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Dodu Nuggets

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid