Biocodex Récupération MC3 arôme Cranberry · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Biocodex Récupération MC3 arôme Cranberry packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Biocodex Récupération MC3 arôme Cranberry

Name: Biocodex Récupération MC3 arôme Cranberry
Brand: Biocodex
SKU: 3583310000054

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Signal unavailable

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from Biocodex Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as sukraloos support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (17 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryDietary Supplements

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity316.8 g (32 sticks)

PackagingCarton, Étui, Batonnet

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Eau purifiée, malate de citrulline 0,9 g, glycérophosphate de magnésium, agent épaississant : gomme xanthane, correcteur d’acidité : hydroxyde de sodium, conservateur : benzoate de sodium, arôme naturel de cranberry, correcteur d’acidité : hydroxyde de potassium, édulcorants : acésulfame de potassium et sucralose.

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 86/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as sukraloos support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Bells Salty peanut barre protéinée

Dietary Supplements. Ingredients: mælke-/melkeproteiner, fugtighedsbevarende middel (glycerol), kollagenhydrolysat, søde-/søtstoffer (maltitol, sukralose), polydextrose, vand/vann, kakaosmør, sødmælks-/helmelkspulver, ristede jordnøddestykker/peanøttbiter, jordnødde-/peanøttpasta (3,2%), solsikkeolie, kakaomasse, fedtfattig/fettredusert kakao, aromaer, salt (0,22%), emulgator(lecithiner). Evidence quality: high

58/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

84/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

58/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Nhco Orthosamine

Dietary Supplements. Ingredients: Panmol B-Complex (extrait de pousse de quinoa, source de vitamines B naturelles), thalle de Lithothamnium calcareum, agent de charge : cellulose microcristalline, extrait de baie d'acérola (Malpighia glabra) standardisé à 50% avec de la vitamine C naturelle, bisglycinate de Zinc, extrait de fruit de grenade (Punica granatum), extrait de baie de goji (Lycium barbarum) standardisé à 25% avec de la vitamine C naturelle, dextrose, L-Leucine, malto - dextrine, L-Valine, vitamine B3 (nicotinamide), chlo - rhydrate de L-Lysine, anti-agglomérant : stéarate de Magnésium végétal, L-Phénylalanine, L-Iso - leucine, vitamine E naturelle (succinate acide de D-alpha-tocophérol), bisglycinate de Fer, Sélénium sous forme de sélénométhionine, L-Thréonine, L-Méthionine, bisglycinate de Manganèse, vita - mine B5 (D-pantothénate de Calcium), L-Histidine, L-Tryptophane, vitamine B8 (biotine), vitamine D3 (cholécalciférol), vitamine B12 (cyanocobalamine), bisglycinate de Cuivre, vitamine B6 (chlorhydrate de pyridoxine), vitamine B2 (riboflavine), vitamine B1 (chlorhydrate de thiamine), picolinate de Chrome, vitamine B9 (acide folique). Gélule : hydroxypropyl - méthylcellulose, colorant: complexes cuivriques de chlorophyllines.. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

76/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

NHCO Nhco Tagvic 56 Gélules

Dietary Supplements. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Dietary Supplements

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

68/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Open Food Facts Nhco Nutrion Symetix Surcharge Ponderale 2X60 Gélules

Dietary Supplements. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Dietary Supplements

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

66/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as sukraloos support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (17 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryDietary Supplements

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity316.8 g (32 sticks)

PackagingCarton, Étui, Batonnet

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 86/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Non-sugar sweeteners (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as sukraloos support a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Similar options worth comparing

Bells Salty peanut barre protéinée

58/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

84/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

58/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Nhco Orthosamine

—

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

76/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

NHCO Nhco Tagvic 56 Gélules

Dietary Supplements. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Dietary Supplements

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

68/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Open Food Facts Nhco Nutrion Symetix Surcharge Ponderale 2X60 Gélules

Dietary Supplements. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

—

nutrition score

Dietary Supplements

Score summary

—

Nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Environmental signal

Data confidence

66/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Biocodex Récupération MC3 arôme Cranberry

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Bells Salty peanut barre protéinée

Nhco Orthosamine

NHCO Nhco Tagvic 56 Gélules

Open Food Facts Nhco Nutrion Symetix Surcharge Ponderale 2X60 Gélules

Biocodex Récupération MC3 arôme Cranberry

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Bells Salty peanut barre protéinée

Nhco Orthosamine

NHCO Nhco Tagvic 56 Gélules

Open Food Facts Nhco Nutrion Symetix Surcharge Ponderale 2X60 Gélules

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Mittesuhkrulised magusained

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs