Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.


Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
47
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
PALFREYMAN A CRÉÉ L'ENTREPRISE WILLIAM & EN 1992 EN NORMANDIE. RIVILÉGIANT DEPUIS TOUJOURS LA QUALITÉ, IL PARTAGE MAINTENANT AVEC SON ÉQUIPE, RIENCE ET LE D'UN MAITRE ARTISA LEURS
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
47
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 67/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
47/100
47
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
70/100
70
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Saumons Fumes D Ecosse. Ingredients: Saumon Atlantique (Salmo salar), sel sec. Ingredients : Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar), dry salt.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
42
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
78/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Saumons Fumes D Ecosse. Ingredients: Saumon atlantique (Salmo salar), sel 300 Contient : Poisson. Transformé en France dans notre qtelier de Wisches (Alsace). A conserver entre ?3cc et +4cc. A consommer dans les 24h après ouverture et ne pas dépasser la date limite de consommation.. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
40
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
75/100
medium reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage