Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.



Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
45
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
3 tartelettes aux courgettes et colin d'Alaska 20% : Farine de _blé_, préparation à base de courgettes 15,4% (courgettes grillées 11,8%, huile de colza, jus de citron à base de concentré, sel, ail, basilic), _colin d'Alaska_ 13,8%, _beurre_, courgettes grillées 10,4%, _œufs_ entiers, _lait_ demi-écrémé, eau, sel, amidon modifié de maïs. Pourcentages exprimés sur la recette de tartelette aux courgettes et colin d'Alaska. _3 tartelettes façon quiche lorraine 20% :_ Farine de _blé_, _lait_ demi-écrémé, _œufs_ entiers 13,8%, _beurre_, lardons cuits fumés 11,7% (poitrine de porc 10.5%, sel, dextrose, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium), eau, _fromage_ blanc, _crème_ fraîche 3,4%, _emmental_, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, noix de muscade, poivre noir. Viande de porc origine Union Européenne. Pourcentages exprimés sur la recette de tartelette façon quiche lorraine. _3 tartelettes aux poivrons 20% :_ Préparation à base de poivrons 24,9% (poivrons rouges mi-séchés 14,2%, huile de colza, concentré de tomates, sel, jus de citron concentré, ail, sucre), farine de _blé_, _œufs_ entiers, beurre, lait demi-écrémé, poivrons jaunes 10,4%, eau, amidon modifié de maïs, sel, ail déshydraté. Pourcentages exprimés sur la recette de tartelette aux poivrons. 3 tartelettes au maquereau et à la moutarde à l'ancienne 20% : Farine de blé, lait demi-écrémé, _beurre_, _œufs_ entiers, emietté de _maquereaux_ 12,4% (filets de _maquereaux_ 11.1%, eau, sel), eau, _fromage blanc_, _crème_ fraîche, tomates semi-déshydratées, _moutarde_ à l'ancienne 2.4% (eau, graines de _moutarde_, sel, vinaigre d'alcool), amidon modifié de maïs, sel, persil, sucre, arôme naturel de poivre. Pourcentages exprimés sur la recette de tartelette au maquereau et à la moutarde à l'ancienne. 3 tartelettes au fromage de chèvre et aux tomates 20% : Farine de _blé_, _fromage_ de chèvre 17,9% (_fromage_ de chèvre 16,1%, eau, sel), _lait_ demi-écrémé, _beurre_, _œufs_ entiers, tomates 8,2%, eau, _crème_ fraîche, basilic, amidon modifié de maïs, sel, arôme naturel de poivre. Pourcentages exprimés sur la recette de tartelette au fromage de chèvre et aux tomates. Peut contenir des traces de crustacés, mollusques, soja, fruits à coque.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
45
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 85/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
45/100
45
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (100 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Snacks. Ingredients: Sötningsmedel/sødestoffer (maltitoler, sorbitoler, steviolglykosider), stabiliseringsmedel/stabilisator (gummi arabicum), ammoniumklorid (=salmiak), lakritsextrakt, aromer, vegetabiliska oljor (kokos, raps), fläderbärs-/hyldebær/hyllebær ekstrakt, ytbehandlings-/overladebehandlingsmiddel (karnaubavax/voks). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
67
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
97/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
69/100
medium reliability

Snacks. Ingredients: Raisins secs bio 40%, huile végétale de tournesol bio 20%, _Noix de cajou_ bio 20%, Physalis bio 10%, Cannerberge bio, (sucre de canne bio, huile végétale de tournesol bio), 10%, _Amandes_ bio.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitriti/nitraadi markerid viitavad kõrgema ettevaatuse vajadusele.
Kohe
Võib suurendada soola- ja säilitusainete koormust ühes toidukorras.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele pikaajalistele tervisenäitajatele.
Loogika: Kategooria viitab töödeldud lihale või koostises/additiivides leidub E249, E250, E251, E252.
Signaalid: Leitud nitriti/nitraadi lisandikoodid: E250. · Koostises tuvastati markerid: nitrit.
See signaal ei asenda personaalset nõustamist. Tõlgendus sõltub tarbimissagedusest ja portsjoni suurusest.
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
Töödeldud liha ja nitritite hariv signaal
C-kiht: hariv kontekstMõõdukas teaduslik alusKui toode kuulub töödeldud liha profiili, kuvame selle vanemale pika vaate hariva märkusena.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage