The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Royal Bourbon
Pantry. Ingredients: Chouchou (79%), huile de tournesol, oignon, vinaigre, curcuma, ail, gingembre, sel, piment, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Royal Bourbon
Pantry. Ingredients: Papaye verte (80%), huile de tournesol, oignon, vinaigre, sel, curcuma, ail, gingembre, piment, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Royal Bourbon
Pantry. Ingredients: Goyaviers entiers (100%). Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Royal Bourbon
Pantry. Ingredients: Jacques (79%), huile, oignon, vinaigre, curcuma, ail, gingembre, sel, pâte de piment vert, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Mangue (83%), huile de tournesol, oignon, ail, gingembre, curcuma, piment, sel, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Tuvastatud lisaained (1)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
71/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Strong
80/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
93/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (21 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitriti/nitraadi markerid viitavad kõrgema ettevaatuse vajadusele.
Kohe
Võib suurendada soola- ja säilitusainete koormust ühes toidukorras.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele pikaajalistele tervisenäitajatele.
Loogika: Kategooria viitab töödeldud lihale või koostises/additiivides leidub E249, E250, E251, E252.
Signaalid: Toode kuulub töödeldud lihatoodete kategooriasse.
See signaal ei asenda personaalset nõustamist. Tõlgendus sõltub tarbimissagedusest ja portsjoni suurusest.
Kui toode kuulub töödeldud liha profiili, kuvame selle vanemale pika vaate hariva märkusena.
Miks oluline
Sõnum on praktiline: sellised valikud sobivad pigem harvemaks, eriti kui lapsel koguneb menüüs palju soolaseid töödeldud tooteid.
Kohe
Võib kaasneda suurem janu ja soolakoormus samal päeval.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib vähendada lapse menüü üldist toitumiskvaliteeti.
Põhineb IARC pikaajalise riski käsitlusel töödeldud lihatoodete kohta ning toitaineprofiili kontekstil.
Signaalid: Toode kuulub töödeldud lihatoodete kategooriasse.
