Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
38
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Miel de thym d'Espagne. Miel ambré, rougeâtre la récolte. Il pâlit et d?/iert roux lorsqu'il se spontanément et de façon assez grossière. Il se caractérise par un padurn fortement odorant, intere piquant au nez D'une saveur affirmée très aromatique, dégage un goût végétal complexe de fruits et Le goût persiste en boucu Véritable ami de votre douceur, il petit-déjeuner, vos et vos boissons . Le miel évolue minutes au bain-marie lui même limpidité qu'au
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
38
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 72/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
38/100
38
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
74/100
74
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (15 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Breakfasts. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
76/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Breakfasts. Ingredients: Miel d'acacia d'Occitanie (France).. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
38
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
83/100
high reliability
Breakfasts. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
76/100
high reliability
Breakfasts. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
40
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
80/100
high reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage