Snacks. Ingredients: Süßungsmitteln (E965, E960a), 2,2% Ammoniumchlorid, Süßholzpulver, Säureregulator (E296) Salz, Farbstoffe (E120, E131, E153, E160a), Aromen, Paprika. Kann Spuren von Soja und Milch enthalten. Mit Süßungs - mitteln, kann bei übermäßigem Verzehr abführend wirken. Wir empfehlen nicht mehr als 20g pro Tag. Erwachsenenlakritz. Evidence quality: high
Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
Need attention
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Formulation markers such as indigokarmiin (E132), brillantsinine (E133), kurkumiin (E100), karmiinhape (E120), titaandioksiid (E171) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (129 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Supporting factors
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Uncertain or missing data
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
What would improve the assessment
Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.
Structured source data
Facts used for scoring
Nutrition
Nutrition score24/100 · Grade E
Ingredient-level explanation
Sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, lait végétal à base de riz (eau, riz, huile de tournesol, sel marin, arôme naturel de vanille), poudre de lait entier, beyrre, pâte d'amande, sirop de sucre inverti, stabilisant : sorbitol, amandes et noisettes torréfiées, alcool de fruits, noix de pécan, noix de cajou, marc de Châteauneuf du Pape, purée de citron, purée de framboise, crème de calisson (amandes et anhydride sulfureux) émulsifiant : lécithine de soja, pâte de noix, pâte de pistache, purée de yuzu, pâte de marrons, extrait de poire William, eau de vie de poire William, marc de muscal Beaumes de Venise, rhum, miel de lavande, concentré de citron, café, sirop de glucose, thé bergamote et arôme naturelle de thé, farine de blé (gluten), graisse végétale (tournesol, colza), matière grasse laitière, sucre du lait, protéine de lait, sel, extrait de malt (orge), caramel beurre salé, sucre caramélisé,éclats de biscuit (farine de blé, sucre, farine de malte de blé, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol, amidon, poudre à lever : E500ii, sel, arôme naturel de vanille), sucre d'érable, huile d'amande et de noisette, vanille, extrait de noix, arômes, fleur de sel, cerneaux de noix, citron pâte naturelle aromatisée (sulfites), épices, granulés de citron, grains de pistache, mures, huile essentielle de citron, arôme naturel de vanille, poudre à lever : E500ii, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol, antioxydant : E306, colorants : E100, E120, E132, E133, E171, E172, bêta-carotène.
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
high5/5 kontrollitud
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud
Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.
Category breakdown
How the separate signals line up
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
24/100
24/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
1
2
3
4
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
What shaped the separate signals
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as indigokarmiin (E132), brillantsinine (E133), kurkumiin (E100), karmiinhape (E120), titaandioksiid (E171) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.
NOVA 4
Environmental Impact
Environmental signal
57
Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)
Ettevaatlikkus
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Ettevaatus: mõõdukasTõenduse tase: mõõdukasSihtrühm: lapsed ja täiskasvanudAllikas: töötlusklass
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.