Search catalog

Urgo Govital Phyto-stress · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Signal unavailable

Urgo Govital Phyto-stress

Name: Urgo Govital Phyto-stress
Brand: Urgo
SKU: 3401560193756

Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

NOVA4

Lisaained:11 tk

Andmete katvus:77%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as indigokarmiin (E132), brillantsinine (E133), titaandioksiid (E171) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (25 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Extrait sec de racine de Valeriana officinalis ; agent de charge: E460 cellulose microcristalline ; extrait sec de parties aériennes de Passiflora incarnata ; extrait sec de rhizome de Rhodiola rosea ; extrait sec de sommités fleuries de Crataegus laevigata et monogyna ; agents de charge: E553b talc, E468 carboxyméthylcellulose de sodium réticulée; antiagglomérants: E551 dioxyde de silicium, E470b stéarate de magnésium ; agents d'enrobage: E464 hydroxypropylméthylcellulose, E463 hydroxypropylcellulose ; colorants : E171 dioxyde de titane, E172 oxyde de fer, E133 bleu brillant FCF, E132 indigotine ; triglycérides à chaines moyennes (huile de coco).

Tuvastatud lisaained (12)

E132 E133 E171 E172 E460 E463 E464 E468 E470B E551 E553 E553B

Product & Packaging

CategoryAutres Complements Alimentaires

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity28 comprimés

PackagingBoîte

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as indigokarmiin (E132), brillantsinine (E133), titaandioksiid (E171) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (25 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Mayoly Spindler

Probiolog Flore Intestinale 30 Gélules

Autres Complements Alimentaires. Ingredients: Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobactrium lactis, Agents de charge : maltodextrine, Épaississants : cellulose microcristalline, alginate de sodium, anti-agglomérant : dioxyde de silice, émulsifiant : stéarate de magnésium Enveloppe de la gélule : hypromellose. Colorant : dioxyde de titane.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreANOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as indigokarmiin (E132), brillantsinine (E133), titaandioksiid (E171) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (25 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (12)

E132 E133 E171 E172 E460 E463 E464 E468 E470B E551 E553 E553B

Product & Packaging

CategoryAutres Complements Alimentaires

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity28 comprimés

PackagingBoîte

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

—/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as indigokarmiin (E132), brillantsinine (E133), titaandioksiid (E171) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (25 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Urgo Govital Phyto-stress

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Probiolog Flore Intestinale 30 Gélules

Urgo Govital Phyto-stress

Similar options worth comparing

Probiolog Flore Intestinale 30 Gélules

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs