Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.


Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
60
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Related products

Plant-based. Ingredients: Pommes de terre* (57,7%), huile de tournesol * (35%), fécule de pommes de terre*, sel, paprika* (1,7%), tomate*, oignon*, ail*.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
91/100
high reliability
Ingredient-level explanation
Flocons d'orge* (gluten), rans secs* (raisins*, huile de tournesol*), flocons de quinoa*, figues* (figues*, farine de riz*), abricots* (abricots*, farine de riz*), flocons d'avoine* (gluten), graines de tournesol*, baies de goji*, pommes*, soufflettes de riz complet*, billettes quinoa riz* (quinoa*, riz*, avoine* (gluten)), quinoa soufflé*. *issus de l'agriculture biologique. Total fruits: 43%. Total quinoa : 15%. Sans sucres ajoutés **contient des sucres naturellement présents. Riche en fibres. Fabriqué en France. ale NL MUESLI MET VRUCHTEN EN QUINOA ngrediënten: gerstvlokken* (gluten), rozijnen* (rozijnen*, zonnebloemolie“), quinoavlokken“, vijgen* ijgen*, rijstmeel"), abrikozen* (abrikozen“, rijstmeel*), havervlokken* (gluten), zonnebloempitten*, pjibessen", appelen", gepofte volle rijst", bolletjes quinoa rijst“ (quinoa", rijst", haver" (gluten)), gepofte uinoa". "afkomstig van biologische landbouw. Totaal vruchten: 43%. Totaal quinoa: 15%. Zonder AneYnegde suikers **bevat van nature aanwezige suikers. Vezelrijk. Vervaardigd in Frankrijk.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
60
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 73/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
60/100
60
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Strong
80/100
80
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
81
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (55 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Plant-based. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
73
Nutrition score
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Plant-based. Ingredients: Baies de Goji.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
45
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
88/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Plant-based. Ingredients: Baies de canneberge BIO, Jus de canne évaporé BIO, Huile de tournesol BIO (- de 1%). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
44
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
87/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage