Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.



Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
47
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Pain aux céréales 68,1% : farine de BLÉ (farine de BLÉ, GLUTEN DE BLÉ, farine de BLÉ MALTÉ), eau, préparation aux céréales 4,1% (AVOINE, maïs, millet, lin, farine de FROMENT, GLUTEN DE BLÉ, sel, farine de SEIGLE), huile de tournesol, levure, poudre de LAIT ÉCRÉMÉ, sel, émulsifiants : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras et stéaroyl-2-lactylate de sodium, acidifiant : acide citrique. Garnitures 31,9% : garniture préparation à base de SAUMONS, ciboulette et jus de citron concentré : SAUMON cuit nature 2,1% (salmo salar) (élevé en Chili, norvège, Irlande, Ecosse), SAUMON fumé 2% (salmo salar, sel) (élevé en norvège, Ecosse, Irlande), FROMAGE blanc, CRÈME fraîche, ciboulette 0,2%, jus de citron concentré 0,03%, amidon transformé de tapioca, épaississants : farine de graines de caroube et gomme xanthane, PROTÉINES DE LAIT. Garniture préparation à base de fromage de chèvre NOIX et miel : fromage de chèvre au LAIT pasteurisé 6,1%, NOIX 0,4%, miel 0,2%, antioxydants : acide ascorbique et alpha-tocophérol. Garniture préparation à base de tomates, roquette et basilic : préparation à base de tomates 4,8% (tomates mi-séchées, concentré de tomates, huile de colza, sel, origan, sucre, ail), roquette 0,6%, eau, basilic 0,1%, sucre, amidon transformé de tapioca, épaississants : farine de graines de caroube et gomme xanthane, PROTÉINES DE LAIT, antioxydant : alpha-tocophérol, ail, poivre. Garniture préparation à base de mousse de canard, bloc de foie gras de canard et figue : mousse de canard au porto 4,7% (graisse de canard (origine : France), foie maigre de canard (origine : France), eau, foie gras de canard 0,4% (origine : France), OEUF, porto, LAIT ÉCRÉMÉ en poudre, sel, amidon transformé de maïs, PROTÉINES DE LAIT, dextrose, épices (poivre, coriandre, cannelle, carvi, girofle, muscade, piment), antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium), bloc de foie gras de canard 0,7% (foie gras de canard (origine : France), eau, sel, porto, armagnac, poivres, sucre, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium), figue 0,5% (figue, farine de riz), poudre de LAIT ÉCRÉMÉ, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. Garniture jambon serrano et BEURRE au piment d'espelette : jambon serrano 4% (jambon de porc, sel), BEURRE 1,5%, piment d'espelette (France) 0,01%. Traces éventuelles de graines de sésame, soja, crustacés, mollusque, céleri et moutarde
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
47
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 88/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
47/100
47
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Quite good
72/100
72
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (148 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Snacks. Ingredients: Sötningsmedel/sødestoffer (maltitoler, sorbitoler, steviolglykosider), stabiliseringsmedel/stabilisator (gummi arabicum), ammoniumklorid (=salmiak), lakritsextrakt, aromer, vegetabiliska oljor (kokos, raps), fläderbärs-/hyldebær/hyllebær ekstrakt, ytbehandlings-/overladebehandlingsmiddel (karnaubavax/voks). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
67
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
97/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
69/100
medium reliability

Snacks. Ingredients: Raisins secs bio 40%, huile végétale de tournesol bio 20%, _Noix de cajou_ bio 20%, Physalis bio 10%, Cannerberge bio, (sucre de canne bio, huile végétale de tournesol bio), 10%, _Amandes_ bio.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitriti/nitraadi markerid viitavad kõrgema ettevaatuse vajadusele.
Kohe
Võib suurendada soola- ja säilitusainete koormust ühes toidukorras.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele pikaajalistele tervisenäitajatele.
Loogika: Kategooria viitab töödeldud lihale või koostises/additiivides leidub E249, E250, E251, E252.
Signaalid: Leitud nitriti/nitraadi lisandikoodid: E250. · Koostises tuvastati markerid: nitrit.
See signaal ei asenda personaalset nõustamist. Tõlgendus sõltub tarbimissagedusest ja portsjoni suurusest.
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
Töödeldud liha ja nitritite hariv signaal
C-kiht: hariv kontekstMõõdukas teaduslik alusKui toode kuulub töödeldud liha profiili, kuvame selle vanemale pika vaate hariva märkusena.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage