Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
38
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Mousse aromatisé à la framboise sur une pâte croustillante 59,3% (sucre, blanc d'_oeuf_, huile de tournesol, farine de _blé_, _fromage_ blanc, poudre de _lait_ entier, _crème_ (_crème_, stabilisant (carraghénanes), _oeuf_ entier, poudre de _lactosérum_, amidon de pomme de terre, amidon transformé de pomme de terre, _beurre_, jaune d'_oeuf_, fibre d'agrume, _beurre_ concentré, jus de citron concentré, beurre de cacao, arôme naturel, émulsifiant (lécithines de _soja_), poudre à lever (carbonates et diphosphates de sodium), sel) Préparation aux framboises 40,7% (morceaux de frmaboises 23%, sucre, purée de framboise sucrée 5,8% (framboises 5,2% sucre), amidon de pomme de terre, épaississant (pectines), jus de citron concentré, fibre d'agrume, arôme naturel, colorant (carmins), conservateur (sorbate de potassium)
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
38
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 80/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
38/100
38
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Quite good
74/100
74
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (68 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Sweet Pies. Ingredients: Farine de blé, beurre, miel, sucre, œuf. Fourrage : sirop de glucose, saccharose, pulpe de myrtilles. Gélifiants: pectine de fruits (E440) et alginate de sodium (E401) correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique (E330) et citrate de calcium (E333), arôme. Conservateur : sorbate de potassium (E202).. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
24
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
80/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sweet Pies. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
22
Nutrition score
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
Sweet Pies. Ingredients: Ingrédients fourrage myrtilles 50%, beurre, miel de lavande, farine, sucre, oeufs, levure.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
33
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
80/100
high reliability
Sweet Pies. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
68/100
medium reliability
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage