Search catalog

Thiriet Ficelle picarde · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Thiriet Ficelle picarde

Name: Thiriet Ficelle picarde
Brand: Thiriet
SKU: 3292590886233

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA3

Lisaained:1 tk

Andmete katvus:83%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (36 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score65/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Lait frais, eau, farine de blé (gluten), jambon cuit supérieur 10 3% (jambon de porc origine France, bouillon : eau, couenne de porc, oignon, os de porc, carotte, sel, persil, ail, clou de girofle, poivre, laurier; sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, antioxydant : erythorbarte de sodium), emmental français 8,4% (lait), champignons de paris 3,5%, œufs frais de poules élevées en plein air 3%, huile de tournesol, comté AOP 2% (lait), lait écrémé en poudre, sel, oignon, parmesan AOP 0,3%, poivre blanc, muscade.

Tuvastatud lisaained (1)

E250

Product & Packaging

CategoryCrepes And Galettes

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity350 g

PackagingBarquette 350g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

65/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 65/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

54/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (36 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Open Food Facts

0752014025653

Crepes And Galettes. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden

Crepes And Galettes

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Atria

Rahkaohukainen Omena-kaneli

Crepes And Galettes. Ingredients: Vesi, vehnäjauho, kananmuna, maitorahka 9%, vehnätärkkelys, riisitärkkelys, vehnäproteiini, maitoproteiini, sokeri, margariini (rapsiöljy,suola), dekstroosi, mausteet (omena, kaneli), jodioitu suola, auringonkukkaöljy, nostatusaineet (E450, E 500), aromit. Saattaa sisältää pieniä määriä ruista, kauraa ja ohraa. Kasvirasva.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Mamma

Pumpkin-curd pancakes

Crepes And Galettes. Ingredients: Kanamuna, vesi, nisujahu, kõrvits 13%, kohupiim 13% (rasvata piim, juuretis), porgand 9%, suhkur, rapsiõli, modifitseeritud maisitärklis, praadimisõli (rapsiõli, karnaubavaha, emulgaator letsitiin, täielikult hüdrogeenitud päevalilleõli), vanillisuhkur (suhkur, vaniliini lõhna - ja maitseaine), jodeeritud sool, piimapulber, kergitusaine söögisooda, kurkum. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Pirkka

6410405272720

Crepes And Galettes. Ingredients: Soijajuoma (37 %) (Kanada ja USA), pinaatti (18 %) (Belgia), vehnäjauho, vesi, kaurahiutale, rypsiöljy, leivinjauhe, suola.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (36 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score65/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (1)

E250

Product & Packaging

CategoryCrepes And Galettes

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity350 g

PackagingBarquette 350g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

65/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 65/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

54/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (36 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Thiriet Ficelle picarde

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 65/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

0752014025653

Rahkaohukainen Omena-kaneli

Pumpkin-curd pancakes

6410405272720

Thiriet Ficelle picarde

Similar options worth comparing

0752014025653

Rahkaohukainen Omena-kaneli

Pumpkin-curd pancakes

6410405272720

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 65/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitritid

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Töödeldud liha ja nitritite hariv signaal