Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Nutrition scoring needs a fuller nutrient panel, especially energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium or salt, and fiber.



Nutrition scoring is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataStructured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
courgettes issues de l'agriculture biologique 25%, eau, poivrons rouges issus de l'agriculture biologique, blé dur demi-compler cuit issu de l'agriculture biologique 11%(gluten), semoule de blé dur issu de l'agriculture biologique 9%(gluten), poivrons jaunes issus de l'agriculture biologique 6%, semoule de maïs issu de l'agriculture biologique 5%, oignons issus de l'agriculture biologique, huile d'olive issue de l'agriculture biologique 2%, tapioca issu de l'agriculture biologique (fécule de manioc issu de l'agriculture biologique, acidifiant : acide citrique), tomates semi-deshydratées issues de l'agriculture biologique 1,5%, ail issu de l'agriculture biologique 1,5%, flocons de seigle issus de l'agriculture biologique 1%(glutrn), basilic issu de l'agriculture biologique 0,8%, persil issu de l'agriculture biologique 0,8%, sel.
Tuvastatud lisaained (1)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The data does not support a reliable overall result.
Nutrition profile
No reliable assessment
—
Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
Moderately processed
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (37 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.