Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.



Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
82
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Low signal
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Haricot blanc tomate feta 50 % : haricot blanc 32 %, tomate pelée (tomate 5 %, jus de tomate 2,7 %, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique), oignon, huile d'olive vierge extra, feta (_lait_) 2,5 %, persil, sel, purée de tomate 0,2 %, sucre, pâte d'ail (ail, sel, correcteurs d'acidités : acide citrique, acide lactique), aneth 0,07 %, poivre. Pois chiche aneth huile d'olive 50 % : pois chiche 41,6 %, huile d'olive extra vierge 3,5 %, jus de citron (eau, jus de citron, acidifiant : acide citrique), aneth 0,6 %, sel, pâte d'ail (ail, sel, correcteurs d'acidités : acide citrique, acide lactique), cumin, poivre.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
82
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 80/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
82/100
82
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (46 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.