Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
35
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Épices (cumin 10%, paprika 5%, coriandre 5%, cannelle 3%, poivre, piment de jamaïque, gingembre, graines de MOUTARDE moulues, curcuma, noix de muscade), plantes aromatiques (oignon 20%, ail, tomate, persil, thym), farine de BLÉ, sel, sucre, extrait de jus de citron. Traces éventuelles de céleri, lait, oeuf, sésame, soja.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
35
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 85/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
35/100
35
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (39 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Food. Ingredients: soy sauce 90% (water, soybeans, salt, wheat flour (contains gluten), water, entro ballage. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
36
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
81/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Food. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
36
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
66/100
medium reliability
Food. Ingredients: Miel de tilleul. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
73
Nutrition score
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
63/100
medium reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage