no brand
Krevety celé varené 60/80
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
Food
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
no brand
Food. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
MOULES du Pacifique décoquillées cuites ( 35%) [mytilus chilensis, élevées au Chili], lamelles de CALMARS blanchis (25% ( [CALMARS (loligo duvauceli, pêchés au chalut en Océan indien ouest (a*) ou loligo edulis ou loligo chinensis, pêchés au chalut en Océan Pacifique centre ouest et/ou Nord Ouest (b*)), eau, sel, correcteurs d'acidité: acide citrique, citrate de sodium], queues de CREVETTES décortiquées blanchies (25%) [CREVETTES (metapenaeus monoceros ou metapenaeus affinis, pêchées au chalut en Océan indien ouest), eau, sel], NOIX DE SAINT-JACQUES(15%) [zygochlamys patagonica, pêchées au chalut en Océan Atlantique sud ouest, origine argentine (c*) ou chlamys opercularis, pêchées au chalut en Océan Atlantique Nord Est - Manche et Mers Celtiques et/ou ouest Ecosse, origine France (d*) ou royaume-uni (e*) ou Irlande (f*)]. Traces éventuelles de poisson et sulfites. *pour connaître l'origine des fruits de mer, voir les lettres sous le numéro de lot
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
75/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Weak
41/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (42 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.