Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
47
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Structured source data
Related products
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
36
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
Help improve this record
Ingredient-level explanation
Dessert glacé saveur vanille et chocolat : eau, _lait_ écrémé réhydraté, sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, graisse végétale de coprah, _lactose_ et protéines de _lait_, poudres de cacao maigre, émulsifiants : E322 (_soja_), pailleté chocolat (1,3 %) (pâte de cacao, sucre, poudre de cacao maigre, émulsifiant : E322, agents d'enrobage : E414 et E904, émulsifiant : E471, gélifiants : E410, E412 et E415, arôme naturel de vanille, colorant E100 et E160b. Dessert glacé saveur fraise et vanille : _lait_ écrémé réhydraté, eau, sucre, purée de fraise (8,1 %), sirop de glucose-fructose : graisse végétale de coprah, _lactose_ et protéines de _lait_, sirop de glucose, pailleté chocolat (0,7 %) (sucre, pâte de cacao, poudre de cacao maigre, émulsifiant : E322, agents d'enrobage : E414 et E904), émulsifiant : E471, gélifiants : E410, E412 et E415, arôme naturel, acidifiant : E330. Dessert glacé saveur chocolat et noisette : _lait_ écrémé réhydraté, eau, sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, graisse végétale de coprah, poudres de cacao maigre, _lactose_ et protéines de _lait_, chocolat (1,6 %) (pâte de cacao, sucre, poudre de cacao maigre, émulsifiants : E471 et E472b, gélifiants : E410 et E412, paillette chocolat (0,7 %) (sucre, pâte de cacao, poudre de cacao maigre, émulsifiant E322, agents d'enrobage : E414 et E904, sirop de glucose, colorant : E150a.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
47
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 88/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
47/100
47
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
51/100
51
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as kurkumiin (E100), karamellvärv (E150), mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), letsitiin (E322), guarkummi (E412) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (62 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Snacks. Ingredients: Fraises de Sarthe 55% , eau, sirop de sucre de canne blond , sirop de maïs déshydraté , jus de citron , farine de guar , farine caroube. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
67
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
76/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Snacks. Ingredients: Lait de nos vaches non homogénéisé, riz rond de camargue* 10%, sucre de canne issu du commerce équitable", extrait de vanille Bourbon 1%. 17,2% des ingrédients sont issus de lAgriculture Biologique.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
64
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
83/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
56
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
68/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage