Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.



Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
65
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Semoule 26,6% (eau, semoule de blé dur, huile d'olive vierge, sel), eau, courgettes grillées 11,6%, carottes 10,2%, navets 7,8%, oignons préfrits (dont huile de tournesol), merguez 4,4% (viande de bœuf origine France, gras de boeuf, épices et plantes aromatiques, sel, sirop de glucose, dextrose, arômes naturels), boulettes au boeuf 4,4% [préparation de viande de boeuf cuite : viande de boeuf origine France 2,8%, blanc d'oeuf de poules élevées en plein air, chapelure (farine de blé, sel), oignons réhydratés, fond de boeuf (viande et jus de cuisson de viande de boeuf, sel), fécule de pomme de terre, bouillon de légumes (légumes et jus de cuisson des légumes : carottes, tomates, oignons, ail), bouillon de boeuf, huile de tournesol, sel], tomates pelées concassées au jus 3,3% (tomates, jus de tomates), poulet mariné et cuit 2,7% (viande de poulet origine France 2,6%, sel, sucre, jus de citron), pois chiches 2,7%, double concentré de tomates, amidon de riz, huile olive vierge, fond de volaille (viande et graisse de poulet, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, lait écrémé en poudre, épice et plante aromatique, extrait de carottes, extraits d'épice et de plantes aromatiques), ail, épices et aromates (cumin, curry, ail, anis, cannelle, coriandre, fenouil, gingembre, girofle, curcuma, badiane, poivre, paprika), sel, purée de piments (piments, sel).
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
65
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Environmental signal
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 91/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
65/100
65
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Weak
26/100
26
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (93 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Food. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
27
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Food. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
27
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability

Food. Ingredients: Jambon de porc origine UE, sel, dextrose, conservateur : salpêtre, saccharose, épices, arômes naturels.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
27
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability

Food. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
27
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage