Name: Casino Duo Carottes et Céleri
Brand: Casino
SKU: 3222477063822

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySalades

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity300 g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Recette sans acide ascorbique : Carotte 49% - céleri 24% - eau - huile de colza - concentré de jus d'orange - sucre - vinaigre d'alcool - persil - sel - moutarde de Dijon (eau - graines de moutarde - vinaigre d'alcool - sel) - moutarde à l'ancienne (eau - vinaigre d'alcool - graines de moutarde - téguments de graines de moutarde - sel - arômes - curcuma) - épaississants: gomme xanthane, gomme guar - arôme naturel de poivre. Traces de céréales contenant du gluten, lait, oeuf, poisson, crustacés, mollusques, soja et fruits à coque. Recette avec acide ascorbique : Carotte 49% - céleri 24% - eau - concentré de jus d'orange - huile de colza - sucre - sucre liquide - vinaigre d'alcool - persil - sel - moutarde de Dijon (eau - graines de moutarde - vinaigre d'alcool - sel) - moutarde à l'ancienne (eau - vinaigre d'alcool - graines de moutarde - téguments de graines de moutarde - sel - arômes - curcuma) - antioxydant : acide ascorbique - épaississants : gomme xanthane - gomme guar - arôme naturel poivre. Traces de céréales contenant gluten, lait, œuf, poisson, crustacés, mollusques, soja et fruits à coque.

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 83/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (57 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Casino Bio Mélange Quinoa, légumes et fruits secs Bio

Salades. Ingredients: Quinoa cuit* 40,8% (quinoa* - eau) - lentilles vertes cuites* 13,2% (lentilles vertes* - eau) - huile de tournesol* - carottes* 5,1% - raisins secs* 5,1% (raisins* - huile de tournesol*) - jus de citron* - poivrons rouges* 4% - oignons jaunes* 4% - menthe* 3% - figues séchées* 2,5% (figues* - farine de riz*) - amandes effilées* 2,5% - vinaigre d'alcool* - sel - persil* 0,5% - curcuma* - poivre blanc* - cannelle* - poivre noir* - muscade* - girofle*. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique. Traces de céréales contenant du gluten, œufs, poissons, soja, lait, céleri, moutarde.. Evidence quality: high

65/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

84/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Casino Bio Mélange Quinoa, légumes et fruits secs Bio

65/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

Nutrition score

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

84/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

65/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

51/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategorySalades

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity300 g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score73/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 73/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 83/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (57 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Casino Duo Carottes et Céleri

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Casino Bio Mélange Quinoa, légumes et fruits secs Bio

Casino Duo Carottes et Céleri

Similar options worth comparing

Casino Bio Mélange Quinoa, légumes et fruits secs Bio

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 73/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs