Name: Casino 12 Mini corolles - Fromage de chèvre & miel, légumes d'été & parmesan, fromage frais & basilic
Brand: Casino
SKU: 3222476703835

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity150 g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Petite corolle farcie au fromage de chèvre et au miel 33,3% (dont 68%* de garniture et 32%* de pâte) : _fromage de chèvre_ 26,6%* - _fromage frais_ - eau - farine de _blé_ - _crème_ - _œuf_ - miel 4,9%* - tomate mi-séchée - huile d'olive vierge extra - blanc d'_œuf_ en poudre - fibre de blé - sel - huile de tournesol - _oeuf_ entier en poudre - épaississants : gomme xanthane, gomme guar - romarin - poivre blanc - levure désactivée - farine de fèves - _gluten de blé_ - farine de _blé_ malté - stabilisant : carraghénanes - dextrose. *pourcentages exprimés sur la petite corolle fromage de chèvre et miel. petite corolle farcie aux légumes et au parmigiano reggiano 33,3% (dont 68%* de garniture et 32%* de pâte) : eau - farine de _blé_ - poivron rouge 11,7%* - courgette grillée 11,7%* - poivron rouge semi-déshydraté 9,2%* - _fromage frais_ - _crème_ - _parmigiano reggiano (parmesan_) 3,1%* - _œuf_ - purée de tomates double concentrée - ciboulette - huile de tournesol - blanc dœ'_uf_ en poudre - amidon transformé - _lactosérum_ en poudre - sel - basilic - _oeuf_ entier en poudre - _lait_ écrémé en poudre - _lactose_ - jaune d'_oeuf_ en poudre - paprika - stabilisant : carraghénanes - sirop de glucose - protéines de _lait_ - poivre blanc - _lait_ entier en poudre - muscade en poudre - levure désactivée - correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique - antioxydant : acide ascorbique - farine de fèves - _gluten de blé_ - farine de _blé_ malté. *pourcentages exprimés sur la petite corolle légumes et parmigiano reggiano. petite corolle farcie au fromage frais et au basilic 33,3% (dont 68%* de garniture et 32%* de pâte) : _fromage frais_ 24,6%* - courgette grillée - eau - farine de _blé_ - _parmigiano reggiano (parmesan_) - _fromage_ râpé - huile d'olive vierge extra - _œuf_ - basilic 2,9%* - blanc d'_œuf_ en poudre - ail - sel - huile de tournesol - _œuf_ entier en poudre - épaississants : gomme xanthane, gomme guar - poivre blanc - levure désactivée - farine de fèves - _gluten de blé_ - farine de _blé_ malté - dextrose. *pourcentages exprimés sur la petite corolle fromage frais et basilic. traces de _soja_, _fruits à coque_, _poissons_, _crustacés_, _mollusques_ et _céleri_.

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 71/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (93 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, category, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality81/100

Data confidence

Quantity150 g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 71/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

81/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (93 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Casino 12 Mini corolles - Fromage de chèvre & miel, légumes d'été & parmesan, fromage frais & basilic

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Casino 12 Mini corolles - Fromage de chèvre & miel, légumes d'été & parmesan, fromage frais & basilic

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs