Search catalog

Casino Wrap bœuf sauce poivre · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Moderate signal

Casino Wrap bœuf sauce poivre

Name: Casino Wrap bœuf sauce poivre
Brand: Casino
SKU: 3222476440976

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4

Lisaained:7 tk

Andmete katvus:81%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (70 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score49/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Galette de blé décongelée 35,3% (farine de blé - eau - huile de colza - poudres à lever : diphosphates, carbonates de sodium - dextrose - acidifiant : acide malique - sel) - préparation de viande bovine cuite décongelée 23,5% [viande de bœuf 23,1% (origine France) - sel] - emmental 11,8% - tomate décongelée 8,8% - crème fraiche légère épaisse [crème légère - amidon transformé de tapioca et de pomme de terre - épaississant : pectines - ferment lactique (contient lait)] - mayonnaise allégée en matière grasse [eau - huile de colza 2% - vinaigre d'alcool - jaune d'œuf - amidon transformé - sucre - moutarde de Dijon (eau - graine de moutarde - vinaigre d'alcool - sel) - sel - lait écrémé reconstitué - acidifiant : acide citrique - épaississant : gomme xanthane] - fromage frais (fromage - sel) - poivre 0,1% - ciboulette déshydratée. Traces de poissons, sésame, soja, fruits à coque.

Tuvastatud lisaained (6)

E296 E330 E415 E440 E450 E500

Product & Packaging

CategorySnacks

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity170 g

OriginsFrance

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

49/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 49/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

49/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (70 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Casino

Tarte chocolat noisette

Snacks. Ingredients: Farine de blé - crème fraîche - sirop de glucose-fructose - sucre - chocolat noir 10% [sucre - pâte de cacao* - beurre de cacao* - émulsifiant : lécithines de soja] - œufs 8.5% - beurre - eau - matières grasses végétales (tournesol, cacao*) - cacao maigre en poudre* - cacao en poudre* - noisettes 0.7% - lait écrémé en poudre - lactosérum en poudre - sel - émulsifiant : lécithines de tournesol - arôme naturel de vanille. Traces d'autres fruits à coque. *Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Pour en savoir plus : www.ra.org. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (70 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score49/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (6)

E296 E330 E415 E440 E450 E500

Product & Packaging

CategorySnacks

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity170 g

OriginsFrance

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

49/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 49/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

49/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (70 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Casino Wrap bœuf sauce poivre

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 49/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Tarte chocolat noisette

Casino Wrap bœuf sauce poivre

Similar options worth comparing

Tarte chocolat noisette

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 49/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs