Name: Les Doodingues Petits pots bi-goût
Brand: Les Doodingues
SKU: 3222475340291

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryGlace Bi Gout

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity12 x 30 g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score49/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

6 pots de crème glacée vanille et de crème glacée chocolat : _crème glacée vanille_ 50% : eau - _lait_ écrémé réhydraté - _crème_ 19% - sirop de glucose-fructose - sucre - lactose et protéines de lait - sirop de glucose - arôme naturel de vanille - émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras - gélifiants : farine de graines de caroube, gomme de guar - colorants : rocou, curcumine. (pourcentage exprimé sur la crème glacée vanille). _crème glacée chocolat_ 50% : eau - _crème_ 19% - _lait_ écrémé réhydraté - sucre - sirop de glucose-fructose - cacao maigre en poudre 4,7% - lactose et protéines de lait - chocolat noir 3,5% (pâte de cacao - sucre - cacao maigre en poudre - émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_) - sirop de glucose - émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras - gélifiants : farine de graines de caroube, gomme de guar. (pourcentage exprimé sur la crème glacée chocolat). 6 pots de crème glacée vanille et de crème glacée fraise : _crème glacée vanille_ 50% : eau - _lait_ écrémé réhydraté - _crème_ 19% - sirop de glucose-fructose - sucre - lactose et protéines de lait - sirop de glucose - arôme naturel de vanille - émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras - gélifiants : farine de graines de caroube, gomme de guar - colorants : rocou, curcumine. (pourcentage exprimé sur la crème glacée vanille). _crème glacée fraise_ 50% : eau - _crème_ 19% - sucre - purée de fraise 16% - _lait_ écrémé réhydraté - lactose et protéines de lait - sirop de glucose-fructose - sirop de glucose - colorants : rouge de betterave, rocou - émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras - jus concentré de citron - gélifiants : farine de graines de caroube, gomme de guar - arôme naturel. traces de _gluten_, d'_oeuf_, d'_arachides_ et de _fruits à coque_. ou allerqiques.

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 49/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

49/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as kurkumiin support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (61 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryGlace Bi Gout

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity12 x 30 g

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score49/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 49/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 85/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

49/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as kurkumiin support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (61 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Les Doodingues Petits pots bi-goût

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 49/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Les Doodingues Petits pots bi-goût

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 49/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs