Search catalog

Wassila Pois chiches · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Low signal

Wassila Pois chiches

Name: Wassila Pois chiches
Brand: Wassila
SKU: 3222474671525

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreANOVA3

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:78%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score80/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Pois chiches - eau - sel. Traces de soja et gluten.

Product & Packaging

CategoryPantry

Label information quality86/100

Data confidence

Quantity400 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

80/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 80/100

Strong

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.

Nutrition profile

Strong

80/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

86/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Casino

Courgettes cuisinées à la provençale

Pantry. Ingredients: Courgettes en rondelles 47% - jus de tomates 17% - oignons - tomates 8,7% - purée de tomates double concentrée 5,7% - huile de tournesol - huile d'olive vierge 1,9% - tomates séchées 1.5% - sucre - sel - ail 0,6% - basilic - amidon modifié de maïs - acidifiants: acide lactique, acide citrique - épices - jus concentré de citron.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreANOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Casino

Haricots blancs

Pantry. Ingredients: Eau - haricots blancs - sel. Traces de soja.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreANOVA3Balanced nutrition

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Casino

Mélange de haricots verts et de flageolets

Pantry. Ingredients: Eau - haricots verts coupés 28% (origine France) - flageolets verts 22% (origine France) - sel.. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreANOVA3Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score80/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Pois chiches - eau - sel. Traces de soja et gluten.

Product & Packaging

CategoryPantry

Label information quality86/100

Data confidence

Quantity400 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

80/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 80/100

Strong

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.

Nutrition profile

Strong

80/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

86/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Wassila Pois chiches

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 80/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Courgettes cuisinées à la provençale

Haricots blancs

Mélange de haricots verts et de flageolets

Wassila Pois chiches

Similar options worth comparing

Courgettes cuisinées à la provençale

Haricots blancs

Mélange de haricots verts et de flageolets

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 80/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid