Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
24
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Related products

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
Ingredient-level explanation
Sauce béarnaise : eau - huile de colza - sirop de glucose-fructose - vinaigre d'alcool - jaune d'_oeuf_ - amidon transformé de maïs - sel - échalote réhydratée 1.8% - plantes aromatiques réhydratées : estragon 1.6%, persil - amidon de maïs - acidifiants : glucono-delta-lactone, acide citrique - arôme naturel d'estragon - jus de citron concentré - épaississants : gomme guar, gomme xanthane - conservateur : sorbate de potassium - colorant : bêta-carotène - arôme naturel d'aneth.sauce bourguignonne : huile de colza - purée de tomates double concentrée 16% - eau - dextrose - vinaigre d'alcool - jaune d'_oeuf_ - sel - vin rouge 1,9% - amidon transformé de maïs - arômes (dont _céleri_) - épaississant : gomme xanthane - piment en poudre - colorant : extrait de paprika.sauce au poivre noir : huile de colza - eau - sirop de glucose-fructose - vinaigre d'alcool - jaune d'_oeuf_ - sel - poivre noir 2,2% - amidon de _blé_ - brandy - _moutarde_ de dijon (eau - graines de _moutarde_ - vinaigre d'alcool - sel - acidifiant : acide citrique) - amidon transformé de maïs - épaississants : gomme guar, gomme xanthane - colorant : bêta-carotène.sauce tartare : huile de colza - eau - sirop de glucose-fructose - jaune d'_oeuf_ - cornichons 3,7% - câpres 3% - sel - amidon transformé de maïs - vinaigre de vin blanc - acidifiants : glucono-delta-lactone, acide citrique, acide acétique - vinaigre d'alcool - oignons déshydratés - _moutarde_ de dijon (eau - graines de _moutarde_ - vinaigre d'alcool - sel - acidifiant : acide citrique) - échalotes déshydratées 0.2% - persil déshydraté 0.14% - conservateur : sorbate de potassium - épaississants : gomme guar, gomme xanthane.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
24
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 73/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
24/100
24
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
81/100
81
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (83 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
74/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
74/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Condiments. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
15
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
72/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage