Search catalog

Sans marque Palet de Dame - glaçage au rhum · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Sans marque Palet de Dame - glaçage au rhum packshot

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:High signal

Sans marque Palet de Dame - glaçage au rhum

Name: Sans marque Palet de Dame - glaçage au rhum
Brand: Sans marque
SKU: 3220000001686

The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4

Lisaained:8 tk

Andmete katvus:85%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (47 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score20/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Sucre glace amylacé 36,1% (Sucre, amidon de maïs), farine de blé 22,9% [farine de BLE, farine de malt de blé (GLUTEN), amylases, antioxygène E300), OEUF 14,1%, Beurre (LAT) (contient colorant: E160a) 9,4%; margarine 9,4% [huiles et graisses végétales raffinées 60% (pane, colza, tournesol, coprah en proportions variables), eau, sel, émulsifiants (E471, E322 (SOJA)), acidifiant (E330), conservateur (E202), sucre, arômes naturels colorant (E160a)) sucre 4%, eau 3,2%, levure chimique 0,45% (diphosphate disodique E450i, carbonate acide de sodium E500, farine de blé (GLUTEN)), rhum traditionnel 0,3%. Traces éventuelles de crustacés, poisson, fruits à coques, céleri, moutarde, sésame, sulfites, mollusques arachides

Tuvastatud lisaained (9)

E1100 E160A E202 E322 E330 E450 E450I E471 E500

Product & Packaging

CategorySnacks

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity95 g

PackagingPlastique

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

20/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 20/100

Very weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result points to clear risk and low quality.

Nutrition profile

Very weak

20/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (47 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Brutaria traditionala

Placinta cu branza

Snacks. Ingredients: Fäinä superioară rau, sare. zahar, drojdie, grasimi vegetale nehidrogenate. aud, lapin, statale, brbuzh vel 40%, aroma. Centine: gluten, cul, lapta.. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Nordthy

Mini Frogs Lakridspulver

Snacks. Ingredients: Süßungsmitteln (E965, E960a), 2,2% Ammoniumchlorid, Süßholzpulver, Säureregulator (E296) Salz, Farbstoffe (E120, E131, E153, E160a), Aromen, Paprika. Kann Spuren von Soja und Milch enthalten. Mit Süßungs - mitteln, kann bei übermäßigem Verzehr abführend wirken. Wir empfehlen nicht mehr als 20g pro Tag. Erwachsenenlakritz. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Cloetta

Jenkki Fresh Melon Slush

Snacks. Ingredients: Sweeteners (xylitol 35%, sorbitol, mannitol, acesulfame K, sucralose), chewing gum base mass, flavourings, acidity regulators (citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid), humectant (glycerol), emulsifier (lecithins), antioxidant (BHT).. Evidence quality: high. Nutrition score is currently hidden

NOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Taffel

Cheese balls chili

Snacks. Ingredients: Corn flour, vegetable oils (sunflower, rapeseed), spice mix (maltodextrin (from maize or potato), CHEESE POWDER (EU), CREAM POWDER, flavour enhancer (E621, E635), salt, dextrose, flavouring, tomato, glucose syrup, sugar, aroma, potassium chloride, spice extract (paprika, cayenne pepper), onion, acidity regulator (citric acid WHEY POWDER (from MILK)). May contain traces of WHEAT. Gluten free. Evidence quality: high

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Similar options worth comparing

Brutaria traditionala

Placinta cu branza

Snacks. Ingredients: Fäinä superioară rau, sare. zahar, drojdie, grasimi vegetale nehidrogenate. aud, lapin, statale, brbuzh vel 40%, aroma. Centine: gluten, cul, lapta.. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreDNOVA4Well-documented label

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Nordthy

Mini Frogs Lakridspulver

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Cloetta

Jenkki Fresh Melon Slush

NOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Taffel

Cheese balls chili

Nutri-ScoreENOVA4Well-documented label

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Formulation markers such as mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
A long ingredient list (47 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score20/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Tuvastatud lisaained (9)

E1100 E160A E202 E322 E330 E450 E450I E471 E500

Product & Packaging

CategorySnacks

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity95 g

PackagingPlastique

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Nutrition score

20/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 20/100

Very weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

High reliability

high5/5 kontrollitud

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result points to clear risk and low quality.

Nutrition profile

Very weak

20/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as mono- ja diglütseriidid (E471), letsitiin (E322) support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (47 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Sans marque Palet de Dame - glaçage au rhum

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 20/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Placinta cu branza

Mini Frogs Lakridspulver

Jenkki Fresh Melon Slush

Cheese balls chili

Sans marque Palet de Dame - glaçage au rhum

Similar options worth comparing

Placinta cu branza

Mini Frogs Lakridspulver

Jenkki Fresh Melon Slush

Cheese balls chili

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 20/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs