Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
36
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
farine L blé* (gluten), frais, Ettre* 14,7%, sucre*, levain* (çŒire —Z blé* , eau), levure, sel fiTin (Noinmutier ou Guérande). DŒtre: * ngé&nts dffigire agicde obtenus Elon le biologque. Ingrédients mierunt du GRAD-OIESI contient : gluten, œufs et lait. Traces éventuelles de sQb. SANS - SANS ADDITIF.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
36
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 77/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
36/100
36
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Moderately processed
Moderately processed · Limited estimate
67
Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
A long ingredient list (23 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Boulangerie. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
62
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
75/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Boulangerie. Ingredients: FARINE BLANCHE ENRICHIE NON BLANCHIE, EAU, CANNEBERGES, JUS D’ORANGE, FIBRE D’_AVOINE_, SUCRE, HUILE D'OLIVE, LEVURE. SEL, GOMME DE XANTHANE, ACIDE FUMARIOUE, ENZYME, AROME NATUREL.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
69
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage