The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Bonduelle restauration
Pantry. Ingredients: Green and yellow zucchinis in varying proportion. May contain : CELERY. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Bonduelle restauration
Pantry. Ingredients: Parsnip. May contain : CELERY. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Bonduelle restauration
Pantry. Ingredients: Carrots, yellow carrots. May contain : CELERY. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Bonduelle restauration
Pantry. Ingredients: Sweet corn, soaked dried kidney beans, carrots, CELERY, green beans, peas, red pepper bell, green bell peppers. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Butternut 22.8%, pumpkin 22.8%, breadcrumbs (WHEAT flour, yeast, salt, husked millets seeds, pumpkin seeds, brown flax seeds, black onion seeds, colza oil), carrots 14.9%, Sunflower oil, water, MOZZARELLA (pasteurised MILK, salt, lactic ferments, coagulant) 4.1%, maize flour, WHEAT flour, [free range] EGG white powder, salt, dehydrated garlic, turmeric. May contain : CELERY
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Environmental signal
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
69/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
Highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Strong
80/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
79/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Formulation markers such as kurkuma support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
A long ingredient list (48 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
