Search catalog

Bonduelle Riz de broccolis · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

Nutrition interpretation:Low signal

Bonduelle Riz de broccolis

Name: Bonduelle Riz de broccolis
Brand: Bonduelle
SKU: 3083681130164

The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.

Nutri-ScoreANOVA1

Lisaained:0 lisaainet

Andmete katvus:69%

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score82/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Broccoli. May contain CELERY

Product & Packaging

CategoryPantry

Label information quality71/100

Data confidence

Quantity400 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Minimally processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

82/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 82/100

Strong

processing is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Processing

Weakest area

Label quality

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.

Nutrition profile

Strong

82/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Minimally processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

71/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, allergens, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Similar options worth comparing

Bonduelle restauration

Poêlée Marrakech (cuisinée)

Pantry. Ingredients: Grilled green zucchini 26%, carrots 20%, soaked dried chick peas 16%, water, green olives (salt) 9.5%, raisins or sultana (rapeseed oil) 6.5%, tomato paste, sunflower oil, rice flour, salt, garlic, raz el hanout (cumin, cardamom, turmeric, ginger, coriander), yeast extract, pepper. May contain : GLUTEN, CELERY, MUSTARD. Evidence quality: medium

Nutri-ScoreCNOVA3Plant-based

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.

Need attention

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Nutrition score82/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Broccoli. May contain CELERY

Product & Packaging

CategoryPantry

Label information quality71/100

Data confidence

Quantity400 g

Processing & Formulation

Processing

Minimally processed

Formulation complexity

NOVA group

Nutrition score

82/100

0–24

25–44

45–59

60–74

75–100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 82/100

Strong

processing is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Processing

Weakest area

Label quality

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Medium reliability

medium5/5 kontrollitud

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

stats.completeness
Kinnitatud
stats.ingredients
Kinnitatud
attributeGroups.processing
Kinnitatud
stats.additives
Kinnitatud
stats.nutriScoreNote
Kinnitatud

Andmekindlus peegeldab tõenduspõhisust ja andmete täielikkust, mitte toote tervislikkust.

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.

Nutrition profile

Strong

82/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Minimally processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

71/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Bonduelle Riz de broccolis

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 82/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Poêlée Marrakech (cuisinée)

Bonduelle Riz de broccolis

Similar options worth comparing

Poêlée Marrakech (cuisinée)

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Nutrition

Product & Packaging

Processing & Formulation

Nutrition score 82/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Environmental Impact

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid