Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
78
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Low signal
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Green fine flageolet beans, water, salt
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
78
/100
Nutrition profile
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Environmental signal
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Data confidence 71/100
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
78/100
78
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Strong
80/100
80
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
79/100
79
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Pantry. Ingredients: Sweet corn, water, salt. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
75
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
83/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Pantry. Ingredients: Sweet corn, water, salt. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
75
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
83/100
high reliability
Pantry. Ingredients: Sweet corn in kernels, water, salt. Contains natural sugars. Regarding France (if labelling with logo GMO-free) : Sweet corn in kernels GMO-free (Genetically Modified Organism), water, salt. Contains natural sugars.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
75
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability
Pantry. Ingredients: Rehydrated white beans 49%, water, tomato paste 7.1%, tomato puree 3.1%, sugar, red wine vinegar, salt, spirit vinegar, natural flavourings, yeast extract, natural onion flavouring with other natural flavourings.. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
78
Nutrition score
environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
73/100
medium reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage