Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
71
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Low signal
The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Extra small green beans, water, salt.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
71
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 86/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.
Nutrition profile
Quite good
71/100
71
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Highly processed
Highly processed
34
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Strong
79/100
79
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
86/100
86
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Semoule de maïs 64%, sucre, miel 3%, sirop de glucose, huile de tournesol, sel, sirop de caramel (sucre, eau). Traces éventuelles de gluten, d'arachides, de fruits à coque, de lait, de soja et de graines de sésame.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
40
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
83/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Sémola de trigo duro de calidad superior, huevo en polvo rehidratado (16,6%). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
78
Nutrition score
processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
78/100
high reliability
Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Patata 87%, aceite de girasol 6%, harina de arroz, patata deshidratada, sal, estabilizante: hidroxipropilmetilcelulosa, dextrosa, cúrcuma. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
62
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
87/100
high reliability
Aliments D Origine Vegetale. Ingredients: Eau, son davoine* 26,1%, blanc d’œuf en poudre*, lait écrémé en poudre*, poudre levante*, sel marin.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
71
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage