Name: LINDT La tarte chocolat
Brand: LINDT
SKU: 3046920045926

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryTablette De Chocolat

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity100

PackagingCarton

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score22/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre laitier concentré, beurre cacao, éclats de biscuits (farine de blé, matière grasse végétale (coco, tournesol), sucre, sirop de glucose, protéines de lait poudre à lever (carbonates d‘ammonium et de sodium), sel) 3%, cacao maigre, sucre inverti, sirop de glucose, amandes, stabilisant (sorbitol), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), poudre de lait écrémé arôme.

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 22/100

Very weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 81/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result points to clear risk and low quality.

Nutrition profile

Very weak

22/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Casino Chocolat noir fourrage à la truffe fantaisie et aux éclats de fèves de cacao torréfiés et caramélisés

Tablette De Chocolat. Ingredients: Chocolat noir 52% (sucre - pâte de cacao - beurre de cacao - matière grasse de lait anhydre - émulsifiant : llécithine de tournesol - arôme naturel de vanille) - fourrage 48% [ graisses végétales de palme et palmiste - sucre - cacao maigre en poudre - éclat de fèves de cacao torréfiés caramélisés 5% ( éclats de fèves de cacao - sucre ) - pâte de noisettes - lactosérum en poudre - pâte de cacao - beurre de cacao - arômes - matière grasse de lait anhydre - émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol] * Exprimé sur le fourrage Traces d'autres fruits à coque, gluten et oeufs Cacao 49 % minimum dans le chocolat. Evidence quality: medium

27/100

nutrition score

Tablette De Chocolat

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

56/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

27/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Casino Chocolat noir fourrage à la truffe fantaisie et aux éclats de fèves de cacao torréfiés et caramélisés

27/100

nutrition score

Tablette De Chocolat

Score summary

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

56/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

27/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Mixed

55/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

67/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryTablette De Chocolat

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity100

PackagingCarton

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score22/100 · Grade E

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 22/100

Very weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 81/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result points to clear risk and low quality.

Nutrition profile

Very weak

22/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (43 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

LINDT La tarte chocolat

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 22/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Casino Chocolat noir fourrage à la truffe fantaisie et aux éclats de fèves de cacao torréfiés et caramélisés

LINDT La tarte chocolat

Similar options worth comparing

Casino Chocolat noir fourrage à la truffe fantaisie et aux éclats de fèves de cacao torréfiés et caramélisés

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 22/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs