The nutrient profile looks comparatively strong based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
U
Pantry. Ingredients: Légumes (55%) (Navets, carottes, courgettes, pois chiches, poivrons rouges et verts, garniture de CELERI), eau, sel, purée de tomates double concentrée, amidon modifié de manioc, arôme naturel ( contient du CELERI), extrait de paprika. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten et de soja.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Courgettes 26%, aubergines pré-frites 16% (aubergines, huile de tournesol), oignons, purée de tomate 12%, eau, huile d'oliver vierge extra 2%, sucre, huile de colza, arômes, amidon transformé de maïs, sel, jus concentré de citron, épaississant : gomme xanthane, acidifiant : acide citrique, ail, lait écrémé.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
nutrition profile is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Nutrition profile
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.
Nutrition profile
Strong
80/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Strong
80/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
79/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (39 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
