Open Food Facts
Tête roulée de porc en vinaigrette
Pantry. Evidence quality: medium
Nutri-ScoreEPantry
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Open Food Facts
Pantry. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Open Food Facts
Pantry. Ingredients: Langue et museaux abats de porcmaigre de Langue et couenne de jambon.eau sel dextrose, sirop de glucose, antioxydant E316 E301 préparations aromatisantes. substances aromatisantes épices et plantes aromatiques, vin blancmodifié (sel. préparation aromatisantes sal fites) conservateur E250, colorant E120. gélifiant E407 E410. exhausteur de gout E621 barde (eau gras et proteines de porc. gélifiant E401 cel vinaigre huile de tournesol vinaigre d'alcool coloré. Légumes(oignon persil) colorant caramel E150c Présence fortuite de céleri gluten. seufs saja. Lait, fruits à coques. sad fites cruetaré nenn tesame malluenue matarde. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
medium
Data confidence
Medium reliability
Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
22/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
67/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.