Name: Freeway Ice Tea infusion
Brand: Freeway
SKU: 20695422

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality74/100

Data confidence

Quantity1l

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

imone Pro e rüht huse CH Aufguss aus Schwarztee mit Hagebutten und Hibiskusblüten mit Zitrone. Pasteurisiert.⚫ Zutaten: Aufguss aus Schwarztee mit Hagebutten und Hibiskusblüten, Zucker, 2% Zitronensaft aus Konzentrat, Sauerungsmittel: Citronensäure. *Rainforest Alliance - zertifiziert. Mehr unter: ra.org. Nach dem Öffnen aufrecht im Kühlschrank aufbewahren und innerhalb von 3 Tagen konsumieren. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Deckel. Infusion de thé noir avec des cynorhodons et des fleurs d'hibiscus avec du citron. Produit pasteurisé. Ingrédients: infusion de thé noir aux Cynorrhodons et aux fleurs d'hibiscus, sucre, 2% jus de citron à base de concentré, acidifiant: acide citrique *Certifié Rainforest Alliance. En savoir plus: ra.org. Après ouvert, à conserver en position debout au refrigérateur et à consommer sous 3 jours. Non ouvert à consommer de préférence avant le: voir couvercle. Infuso di tè nero con rosa canina e fiori di ibisco con limone. Prodotto pastorizzato. Ingrediente infuso d te nero con rosa canina e fiori di ibisco, zucchero, 2% succo di limone da concentrato, acidificante: acido citrico. "Certificato Rainforest Alliance. ra.org .tima volta aperto, conservare in posizione verticale in frigo e consumare entro 3 giorni. Da consumarsi preferimen te entro il fin confezione integral vedere coperchio Nettoinhalt/Volume net/ Contenuto netto 2069 5422 11e 0 PET Flasche bottigna CE

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 68/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (39 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, category, nutrition panel, and allergens. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryFood

Label information quality74/100

Data confidence

Quantity1l

Ownership

Processing

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 2

Performance

Nutrition scoreInsufficient evidence

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

—

/100

Nutrition profile

No nutrition score

No reliable assessment

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 68/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The data does not support a reliable overall result.

Nutrition profile

No reliable assessment

—

Nutrition score is unavailable because core nutrient evidence is incomplete.

Processing

Moderately processed

Moderately processed · Limited estimate

Processing indicator is available, but part of the classification is inferred.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Quite good

74/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 2 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high

Pulls the score down

Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
A long ingredient list (39 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Freeway Ice Tea infusion

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Freeway Ice Tea infusion

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Supporting factors

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

What would improve the assessment

Label quality

Need attention

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

No nutrition score

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid