sportyfeel Proteindryck med päronsmak · Nutrisiq

Back to discovery

Nutrition snapshot

sportyfeel Proteindryck med päronsmak

Name: sportyfeel Proteindryck med päronsmak
Brand: sportyfeel
SKU: 20642945

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition interpretation

Moderate signal

The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.

Help improve this record

Improve product data

Explore alternatives More from sportyfeel Suggest correction

Signal classes

Need attention

High sugar content (7.4 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (12 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryBeverages

Label information quality85/100

Data confidence

Quantity330 ml

Packagingen:Container

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Protein / 100g

8.3 g

Sugar / 100g

7.4 g

Nutrition score62/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

vitaminberikad mjölk (laktosfri pastöriserad mjölk, vitamin D), _mjölkprotein_, socker, arom, stabiliseringsmedel (karragenan).

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 62/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 69/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

85/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (7.4 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (12 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Source provenance supports confidence.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, fiber per 100g, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Signal classes

Need attention

High sugar content (7.4 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Need attention

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
A long ingredient list (12 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryBeverages

Label information quality85/100

Data confidence

Quantity330 ml

Packagingen:Container

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Protein / 100g

8.3 g

Sugar / 100g

7.4 g

Nutrition score62/100 · Grade C

Ingredient-level explanation

vitaminberikad mjölk (laktosfri pastöriserad mjölk, vitamin D), _mjölkprotein_, socker, arom, stabiliseringsmedel (karragenan).

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 62/100

Quite good

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 69/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The overall assessment is good, but some areas warrant further review.

Nutrition profile

Quite good

62/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

85/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

High sugar content (7.4 g/100 g) weakens the nutrition score.
Impact: high
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (12 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Record completeness is 78%.
Impact: medium
Source provenance supports confidence.
Impact: low

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, fiber per 100g, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

sportyfeel Proteindryck med päronsmak

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 62/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

sportyfeel Proteindryck med päronsmak

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 62/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Kõrge vabade suhkrute sisaldus

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Suhkruga joogid lapse puhul

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs