Combino Letras tricolor · Nutrisiq

Combino Letras tricolor · Nutrisiq

Signal classes

Need attention

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Supporting factors

Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.

Supporting factors

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).

Uncertain or missing data

The record is missing a nutrition panel.

What would improve the assessment

Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.

Structured source data

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryPlant-based

Label information quality93/100

Data confidence

78

Quantity500 g

PackagingBolsa de plástico

Ownership

Processing

Minimally processed

Formulation complexity

36

Environmental signal

66

NOVA groupNOVA 1

Performance

Nutrition score82/100 · Grade A

Ingredient-level explanation

Sémola de _trigo_ duro, tomate deshidratado (4%), espinaca deshldratada (2%).

Food score panel

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

82

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 82/100

Strong

processing is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Processing

Weakest area

Environmental signal

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 78/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is strong and supports a positive overall assessment.

Nutrition profile

Strong

82/100

82

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Minimally processed

Minimally processed

100

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

66

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

93/100

93

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Related products

Similar options worth comparing

Croustisud Chips de pomme de terre bio au paprika packshot

Croustisud Chips de pomme de terre bio au paprika

Plant-based. Ingredients: Pommes de terre* (57,7%), huile de tournesol * (35%), fécule de pommes de terre*, sel, paprika* (1,7%), tomate*, oignon*, ail*.. Evidence quality: high

55/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

55

Nutrition score

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

91/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

55/100

55

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Highly processed

34

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

66/100

66

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

86/100

86

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Open Food Facts Canneberge biologique packshot

Open Food Facts Canneberge biologique

Plant-based. Evidence quality: medium

73/100

nutrition score

Plant-based

Score summary

73

Nutrition score

Quite good

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while label quality needs the most caution.

Strongest: Environmental signalWeakest: Label quality

Data confidence

72/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Quite good

73/100

73

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Processing unknown

Insufficient evidence

—

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

80

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

60/100

60

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Greenfood Goji berries packshot

Greenfood Goji berries

Plant-based. Ingredients: Baies de Goji.. Evidence quality: high

45/100

nutrition score

Lower processing burdenWell-documented label

Score summary

45

Nutrition score

Mixed

processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.

Strongest: ProcessingWeakest: Nutrition profile

Data confidence

88/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

45/100

45

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Minimally processed

Minimally processed

100

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

80

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

86/100

86

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

Nature + CANNEBERGE packshot

Nature + CANNEBERGE

Plant-based. Ingredients: Baies de canneberge BIO, Jus de canne évaporé BIO, Huile de tournesol BIO (- de 1%). Evidence quality: high

44/100

nutrition score

Well-documented labelStrong evidence coverage

Score summary

44

Nutrition score

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Label qualityWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

87/100

high reliability

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

44

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Highly processed

Highly processed

34

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Strong

80/100

80

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Strong

86/100

86

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.