Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
13
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Maltodextrine, sel, dextrose, épices (poivre noir, gingembre, graines de fenouil, piment rouge, anis étoilé, cannelle), amidon de maïs, amidon de maïs prégélatinisé, beurre en poudre (beurré (contient du lait), lait écrémé), ail déshydraté, oignons déshydratés, farine de blé enrichie (farine de blé, calcium (carbonate de calcium), fer élémentaire, niacine (acide nicotinique), vitamine B1 (chlorhydrate de thiamine)), persil, extrait de malte d'orge, colorant: curcumine, extrait de paprika; extraits d'épices (poivre noir, paprika), arôme naturel.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
13
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 87/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result points to clear risk and low quality.
Nutrition profile
Very weak
13/100
13
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
88/100
88
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (2 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Formulation markers such as kurkumiin support a more processed classification.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products
Marinade. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
5
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
75/100
medium reliability
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Marinade. Ingredients: Oignons déhydratés (36 %), paprika (17 %), ail déhydraté (12 %), sel, arôme naturel d'oignon grillé, moutarde en poudre ( moutarde blanche, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, sucre), sucre, poivre noir, origan, huile de colza, persil, anti-agglomérant: dioxyde de silicium. Sans conservateur, sans colorant artificiel, sans arôme artificiel.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
11
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Marinade. Ingredients: Sel, sucre, maltodextrine, tomate en poudre (8 %), amidon modifié de maïs, paprika fumé (6 %)’ ail déshydraté (4 %), oignon déshydraté, piment de Cayenne, persil, arôme, maltodextrine fumée, poivre noir, arôme de fumée, anti-agglomérant: dioxyde de silicium, sel fumé, colorant: extrait de paprika. Sans conservateur, sans colorant artificiel, sans huile hydrogénée. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
18
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Marinade. Ingredients: eau, 5% ail (contient des sulfites), 5% paprika, sel, 3% coriandre, correcteurs d'acidité: acétates de sodium, acide citrique; cumin, huile de colza, chapelure (farine de blé enrichie [farine de blé, fer, thiamine, niacine, carbonate de calcium],sel), gingembre, curcuma, piment rouge, tamarin, vinaigre d'alcool.. Evidence quality: medium
nutrition score
Score summary
33
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
71/100
medium reliability
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage