Name: Italiamo Dolci armonie
Brand: Italiamo
SKU: 20505417

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryToskanische Gebäckmischung

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity365

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score47/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

45% Mandein, Zucker, Wasser, Puderzucker (Zucker, Maisstärke) Stabilisator: Sorbit: Hühnereieiweißpulver. naturliches Aroma, Konservierungestoft Kaliumsorbat.* von Eiern aus Bodenhaltung. Kann Spuren von Milch, Soja, Weizen und anderen Schalenfrüchten enthailten Zutanen Zucker 41% Mandeln Wasser Inulinchorie Puderucke Zucker Maissae Multmereielwe natifiche omen Knservieung Sorbinsaure Backtretmtet A nate Speisesal womEierm aus Bodenhaltung Kann Spuren wan Welzen Miich Saa and anderen Sichaenfichtnnth Ricciarell-Gebäck mit Mandiel ahnwerte Energie Fem Amaretti weich-italienische Makronen. a 00pa13g 15ic e/100ge/10 g (ca. 1 Stück) 202 kl/48 kcal 2,5g 0.2g %R Nährwerte 1917k 459 cal 249 u0ica 23.0g davon gesämge Fetsäuren 19g 02g 50.0E 50.06 954 0.10g R reference intake - Refenemzmenge fur emen durchschnitichen Erwactsemem400 2000 c 2% 4% 1% Energie 2015 kl/482 kcal 25.0g 30g Fett davon gesåttigte Fettsäuren 2.1 g 50,0g 47,0g 12.0g 0,02g 3% 65g Kohlenhydrane davon Zucker Eweis Salz 2% 5,0g Kohlenhydrate davon Zucker 7% E.5g 12g 2% 0.01g a5 5% 4,7g 2% 12g Eiweiß <0,01g <1% Salz RI (reference intake) Referenzmenge für einen durchschnittlichen Erwachsenen (8400 kJ/2000 kcal) Packung enthät 5 Sick à ca 13g Packung enthalt 10 Stück à ca. 10 g

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 47/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 80/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (29 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, and nutrition panel. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryToskanische Gebäckmischung

Label information quality88/100

Data confidence

Quantity365

Ownership

Processing

Very highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 4

Performance

Nutrition score47/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 47/100

Mixed

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

high

Data confidence

Data confidence 80/100

High reliability

The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Mixed

57/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

88/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (88%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (29 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Italiamo Dolci armonie

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 47/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Italiamo Dolci armonie

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 47/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Ultra-töödeldud toit (NOVA 4)

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid

Ultra-töödeldud profiil (NOVA 4) lapse menüüs