Need attention
- Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
What would improve the assessment
- Part of this signal relies on inferred values, so direct declared data would improve reliability.


Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
56
/100
Nutrition interpretation
Moderate signal
The nutrient profile is mixed or moderate based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
68,4% pain spécial aux céréales et graines [farine de blé, eau, 8,7% bréparation à base de farioesetèéréales (farine de blé, semoule de blé dur, gluten de blé, farine de seigle, graine de lin brun, farine de riz, graines'de millet et de lin jaune, farine de blé malté toasté, graines de sésame, farine de sarrasin, farine d 'avoine, farine d orge maltée toastée, fibre de sarrasin), huile de tournesol, levurqde boulangerie, 0,9% graines (linjaune, millet, sésame, pavot bleu, concassé de blé malté toasté), sel], 3,8% mousse de canard au Porto 11,1% graissqde canard, 1, fôie maigre de canard, eau, 0,4% foie gras de canard, œufs, 0,1% Porto, lait écrémé en poudre, sel, amidon de maïs, protéines de lait, épices (muscade, cannelle, poivre, coriandre, cartii, girofle, piment), dextrose, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium ; conservateur : nitrite de sodium], 3,8% fromage (lait) de chèvre, 3, 7% rôti de porc êuit supérieurtraité en salaison 13,4% longe de porc (origine UE), sel, sirop de glucose, arômes naturels, dextrose, bouillon de légumes (pomme de terre, poireau, oignon), antioxydant : éffthorbate de sodium ; conservateur : nitrite de sodium ; saccharose, colorant : caramel au sulfite d 'amoniuml, 2,3% beurre léger (lait) (eau, beurre (lait), amidon modifié de maïs, amidon de pomme de terre, acidifiant : acidé lactique ; sel, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras ; conservateur : sorbate de potassium ; colorant : caroténoïdes ; arôme naturel), 2,1% tomates pelées concassées au jus de tomate (1,4% tomates pelées concassées, 0,6% jus de tomate, acidifiant : acide citrique), lait demi-écrémé, from?age (lait) blanc, 1,6% saumon (poissons) cuit (1,5% saumon (poissons), sel), 1,6% saumon (poissons) fumé (saumon (poissons), sel), eau, 13% olive noire.dénoyautée (olive, sel), 1,2% préparation à base de tomates [0,8% tomates (tomates mi-séchées, concentré de tomates), huile de colza, sel, origan, sucre, ail], 1,1% figues, 1% fromage (lait) de brebis, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, huile de tournesol, purée de tomate, 0,4% noix hachée, 0,3% moutarde à l'ancienne (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), chutney d'oignon toignon blanc, sucre, raisins (raisin, huile végétale de coton), vinaigre de Xérès, vin rouge, vinaigre de?idre, jus de citron, gélifiant : carraghénanes ; ail, cannelle, gingembre), 0,2% miel, ciboulette, 0,2% zeste de citron semi-confit (sirop de glucose-fructose, 0,05% zestes de citronjaune, eau, sucre, correcteur d t acidité : acide citrique ; antioxydant : acide ascorbique), jus de citron, échalote, sel. Traces éventuell s
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
56
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Processing
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 77/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The result is uneven: strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Nutrition profile
Mixed
56/100
56
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Very highly processed
Very highly processed
12
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Quite good
72/100
72
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
74/100
74
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Declared NOVA group 4 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Isolated or heavily fractionated ingredients (1 markers) support a more processed classification.
Impact: medium
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (63%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Related products

Snacks. Ingredients: Sötningsmedel/sødestoffer (maltitoler, sorbitoler, steviolglykosider), stabiliseringsmedel/stabilisator (gummi arabicum), ammoniumklorid (=salmiak), lakritsextrakt, aromer, vegetabiliska oljor (kokos, raps), fläderbärs-/hyldebær/hyllebær ekstrakt, ytbehandlings-/overladebehandlingsmiddel (karnaubavax/voks). Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
67
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
97/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
69/100
medium reliability

Snacks. Ingredients: Raisins secs bio 40%, huile végétale de tournesol bio 20%, _Noix de cajou_ bio 20%, Physalis bio 10%, Cannerberge bio, (sucre de canne bio, huile végétale de tournesol bio), 10%, _Amandes_ bio.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
55
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.
Data confidence
90/100
high reliability
Snacks. Evidence quality: medium. Nutrition score is currently hidden
nutrition score
Score summary
—
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
50/100
medium reliability
Töödeldud lihatooted ja nitriti/nitraadi markerid viitavad kõrgema ettevaatuse vajadusele.
Kohe
Võib suurendada soola- ja säilitusainete koormust ühes toidukorras.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele pikaajalistele tervisenäitajatele.
Loogika: Kategooria viitab töödeldud lihale või koostises/additiivides leidub E249, E250, E251, E252.
Signaalid: Leitud nitriti/nitraadi lisandikoodid: E250. · Koostises tuvastati markerid: nitrit.
See signaal ei asenda personaalset nõustamist. Tõlgendus sõltub tarbimissagedusest ja portsjoni suurusest.
NOVA 4 viitab ulatuslikule tööstuslikule töötlemisele ja suuremale formulatsiooni keerukusele.
Kohe
Võib soodustada ülesöömist, sest maitse- ja tekstuuriprofiil on sageli väga stimuleeriv.
Pikemas vaates
Sage tarbimine seostub kõrgema riskiga ebasoodsatele tervisetulemitele, kuid mõju sõltub toitumismustrist.
Loogika: novaGroup === 4.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud klass).
NOVA klass on tarbimismustri signaal ega tähenda üksiku toote põhjal automaatset diagnoosi.
Ultra-töödeldud märge aitab vanemal hinnata, kas toode sobib igapäevaseks valikuks või pigem harvemaks.
Miks oluline
Rakendus kuvab selle lisakontekstina, et toetada lapse menüü üldist kvaliteeti, mitte anda mustvalget otsust ühe toote kohta.
Kohe
Võib tekkida kiire söömise ja varasema uue isu muster.
Pikemas vaates
Sage kasutus võib nihutada menüüd vähem täisväärtusliku toiduprofiili poole.
Põhineb peamiselt epidemioloogilisel ja institutsionaalsel kirjandusel ultra-töödeldud toitude tarbimismustrite kohta.
Signaalid: NOVA grupp on 4 (ultra-töödeldud profiil).
Töödeldud liha ja nitritite hariv signaal
C-kiht: hariv kontekstMõõdukas teaduslik alusKui toode kuulub töödeldud liha profiili, kuvame selle vanemale pika vaate hariva märkusena.
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage