Nutrition snapshot
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Nutrition score
36
/100
Nutrition interpretation
High signal
The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Ingredients text is not available for this product. Confidence and processing remain cautious because ingredient evidence is missing.
Food score panel
Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.
Nutrition score
36
/100
Nutrition profile
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Label quality
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
Data confidence 79/100
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Confidence layer
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
36/100
36
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Processing unknown
Insufficient evidence
—
Processing indicator is unavailable because ingredient evidence is too limited.
Environmental signal
Mixed
57/100
57
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Quite good
67/100
67
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
No clear positive highlights emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Pulls the score down
Mandatory field coverage is only partial (50%).
Impact: medium
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Ingredient evidence is too limited to classify processing reliably.
Impact: high
The record is missing an ingredient list.
Impact: high
Related products
Snacks. Ingredients: pour un biscuit nature blanc (blanc dlœufs épaissisëantsl E412, E415), sucre glace amylacé, farine de blé (glifrn), pâtissier (lait), fécule de pomme de terre et une pincée de selt - Tzgyentuelles de fruits à seara et 9ja. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
4
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
81/100
high reliability
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Snacks. Ingredients: blanc d'œdfs (blanc d épaississants: E412, E415), sucre glace amylacé, farine de blé (gl±) pâtissier (lait), fécule de pomme de terre et une pincée de sel. Traces éventuelles de fruib à coques, sésame et soja. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
4
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
85/100
high reliability
Snacks. Ingredients: pour un biscuit aux éclats de pistache : blanc d’œufs (blanc d’œufs, épaississants : E412, E415), sucre glace amylacé, farine de blé (gluten), éclats de pistache (fruits à coque) (4,9%), beurre pâtissier (lait), fécule de pomme de terre et une pincée de sel. Traces éventuelles d'autres fruits à coques, sesame et soja.. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
11
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Data confidence
81/100
high reliability
Snacks. Evidence quality: high
nutrition score
Score summary
65
Nutrition score
label quality is the strongest signal right now, while environmental signal needs the most caution.
Data confidence
77/100
high reliability
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage