The nutrient profile is weak based on the available evidence.
Help improve this record
Improve product dataRelated products
Larsen Dovgan
Pantry. Ingredients: Kann kleine Muschelschalenreste und Spuren von KREBSTIEREN enthalten. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Coop
Pantry. Ingredients: water, dried peas 29% (Finland), 3,5% pork (Finland), lard, salt. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Sprouts
Pantry. Evidence quality: medium
medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Jalostaja
Pantry. Ingredients: Water, beef (origin: several EU countries), rennet, rapeseed oil, modified corn starch, _soy protein preparation_, pork (origin: Finland), beef heart, breadcrumbs (_wheat_), _milk powder_, _wheat flour_, sauce powder (i.a. spices (i.a. garlic, black pepper, paprika), aroma, flavor enhancer (E621)), potato flour, onion, spices (onion, white pepper, coriander, lovage), salt, _soy sauce_, potato fiber, color (E150c), stabilizer (E451), glucose, raising agent (E500), thickener (guar gum), sugar, corn maltodextrin, _soy sauce powder_, palm fat powder (includes _milk_), aroma. Meat content 10%.. Evidence quality: high
high confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage
Structured source data
Ingredient-level explanation
Œufs de lompe (Cyclopterus lumpus)
Nutrition score
Nutrition profile
processing is the strongest signal right now, while nutrition profile needs the most caution.
Strongest area
Processing
Weakest area
Nutrition profile
Data confidence
high
Data confidence
High reliability
The data is strong and the assessment carries high confidence.
Category breakdown
The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.
Nutrition profile
Weak
35/100
Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.
Processing
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Minimally processed
Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.
Environmental signal
Mixed
51/100
Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.
Label quality
Strong
86/100
Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.
How is the score built?
Open the methodology note
Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.
The data is broad and consistent. The interpretation is likely to remain stable.
Score drivers
Supports the assessment
Declared NOVA group 1 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium
Pulls the score down
No significant negative factors emerged from the available data.
Impact: low
Uncertain area
Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high
Selle toote puhul ei aktiveerunud laste-keskseid riskisignaale. See ei asenda nõustamist; mõju sõltub kogusest, sagedusest ja üldisest toitumismustrist.
