Name: GULA GULA transatlantique
Brand: GULA
SKU: 2000000067951

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryMelange De Noix Et Fruits Seches

Label information quality78/100

Data confidence

Quantity40 g

PackagingSachet plastique

Ownership

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 3

Performance

Nutrition score44/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

poire - noix de pécan - cranberry : cranberry, huile de tournesol, jus d'ananas

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 44/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

74/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

78/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

Nutrition score measures nutrient profile only. Processing, environment, label quality, and data confidence stay separate so missing data or formulation signals do not silently change nutrition quality.

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

Some source data is incomplete for this product: energy per 100g, sugars per 100g, saturated fat per 100g, sodium per 100g or salt per 100g, nutrition panel, and front image. Scores stay visible, but weaker evidence is reflected in the confidence dimension.

Gula Gula Vin chaud

Melange De Noix Et Fruits Seches. Ingredients: Stick d'orange (zestes d'orange, sirop de glucose, acide citrique) - cranberry (cranberry, huile de tournesol, sucre) - noisette caramélisée au miel (noisette, sucre, glucose, huile de tournesol, miel, émulsifiants : gomme arabique, lécithine de tournesol) - raisin (raisin, huile de tournesol). Evidence quality: medium

47/100

nutrition score

Melange De Noix Et Fruits Seches

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Environmental signalWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

63/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

74/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Gula Gula Vin chaud

47/100

nutrition score

Melange De Noix Et Fruits Seches

Score summary

Nutrition score

Mixed

environmental signal is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest: Environmental signalWeakest: Processing

Data confidence

63/100

medium reliability

Nutrition profile

Mixed

47/100

Nutrition profile

Affected by energy, sugars, saturated fat, sodium, fiber, limited protein support, and cautious fruit/vegetable/legume/nut credit.

Processing

Very highly processed

Processing

Affected by ingredient complexity and degree of processing.

Environmental signal

Quite good

74/100

Environmental signal

Affected by packaging, origin, and estimate coverage.

Label quality

Quite good

72/100

Label quality

Affected by field completeness and record consistency, not by nutrition quality.

medium confidence from label, nutrition, and source coverage

View product

Facts used for scoring

Design

CategoryMelange De Noix Et Fruits Seches

Label information quality78/100

Data confidence

Quantity40 g

PackagingSachet plastique

Ownership

Processing

Highly processed

Formulation complexity

Environmental signal

NOVA groupNOVA 3

Performance

Nutrition score44/100 · Grade D

Ingredient-level explanation

poire - noix de pécan - cranberry : cranberry, huile de tournesol, jus d'ananas

Five-layer evaluation

Each dimension stays separate so the product can score well in one area and weakly in another without hiding trade-offs.

Nutrition score

/100

Nutrition profile

Nutrition score 44/100

Weak

label quality is the strongest signal right now, while processing needs the most caution.

Strongest area

Label quality

Weakest area

Processing

Data confidence

medium

Data confidence

Data confidence 63/100

Medium reliability

Data coverage is partial and the interpretation carries moderate confidence.

Confidence layer

Category breakdown

How the separate signals line up

The profile is on the weaker side and warrants attention.

Nutrition profile

Weak

44/100

Nutrition score is available, but some inputs were inferred.

Processing

Highly processed

Processing indicator kept separate from the nutrition score.

Environmental signal

Quite good

74/100

Estimated environmental signal with limited precision.

Label quality

Strong

78/100

Label quality reflects completeness and consistency of the record, not nutrition quality.

How is the score built?

Open the methodology note

The data is partial. The interpretation is usable but some conclusions may be refined.

Score drivers

What shaped the separate signals

Supports the assessment

Mandatory field coverage is strong (75%).
Impact: medium

Pulls the score down

Declared NOVA group 3 anchors the processing indicator.
Impact: high
A long ingredient list (14 ingredients) supports a more processed classification.
Impact: low

Uncertain area

Core nutrient evidence is incomplete, so the nutrition score is unavailable.
Impact: high
Confidence is reduced by missing nutrition evidence.
Impact: high
The record is missing a nutrition panel.
Impact: high

GULA GULA transatlantique

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 44/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

Similar options worth comparing

Gula Gula Vin chaud

GULA GULA transatlantique

Similar options worth comparing

Gula Gula Vin chaud

Nutrient profile

Need attention

What would improve the assessment

Processing level

Need attention

Label quality

Supporting factors

Uncertain or missing data

Environmental signal

What would improve the assessment

Facts used for scoring

Design

Ownership

Performance

Five-layer evaluation

Nutrition score 44/100

How the separate signals line up

What shaped the separate signals

What lowers the rating

Lapse vaate riskisignaalid